Argument map
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An Argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas.
Contents |
[edit] Overview
Argument Maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking, and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over wicked problems.
This approach in argument mapping seeks to enable research and analysis of naturalistic human decision making in real life contexts of risk and uncertainty. The techniques involved were first presented by Facione and Facione in Thinking and Reasoning in Human Decision Making: The Method of Argument and Heuristic Analysis (The California Academic Press, 2007). The book described the theory, technique, and application of what appeared to be a new analytical methodology.
The book outlined many argument mapping techniques. One of the techniques was how to construct decision maps from oral and textual expressions of individual or group decisions. A&H Method decision maps are meant to illustrate the combinination of reasons-claim argument strands as well as the influences of cognitive heuristics and psychological dominance structuring which emerge from those data.
Two other examples:
 A Rationale map, based on a Bob Dylan song. |
 A Rationale map arguing in favour of Condorcet voting methods |
[edit] See also
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Argument maps |
[edit] References
 |
This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008) |
[edit] Further reading
- Facione, P. and Facione N. (2007). Thinking and Reasoning in Human Decision Making: The Method of Argument and Heuristic Analysis.
- Harrell, Maralee (2005) Using Argument Diagramming Software in the Classroom. [2]
- Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. & Carr, C. (2003) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making Springer-Verlag, London.
- Twardy, Dr. Charles R. (2003) Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 27:2 June 2004.
- Preprints: [3] [4]
- Verheij, B. (2005) Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague.
[edit] External links
 |
This article's external links may not follow Wikipedia's content policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links. |
- Argument Mapping Software
- Argunet (open source, cross platform/java); supports collaboration over argument graphs
- Araucaria (open source, cross platform/java)
- Argumentative (open source, windows); supports single-user, graphical argumentation
- Athena (free for non-commercial use, windows and perhaps Linux and Mac)
- bCisive (commercial, Windows); supports reasoning and decision making by mapping decision problems, options and arguments.
- Carneades (open source, cross platform/java fx); Argument mapping and evaluation, using proof standards; XML argument exchange
- Compendium: designed to support deliberation over issues, ideas and arguments in Wicked problems. Provides visual templates for Argumentation Schemes (free source, cross platform/java)
- Reason!Able (commercial, Windows), superseded by Rationale
- Rationale (commercial, Windows); supports simple "Reasoning" maps and more advanced "Analysis" maps
- truthmapping.com online collaborative, textual argument mapping (with advertisements!)
- debategraph.org (free, creative commons); online collaborative debate and argument mapping in text
- VUE (open source, desktop app, windows, mac and linux support); more a multi-media graph construction tool than a kit to represent formal argument
