Regression testing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Regression testing is any type of software testing which seeks to uncover software regressions. Such regressions occur whenever software functionality that was previously working correctly, stops working as intended. Typically regressions occur as an unintended consequence of program changes. Common methods of regression testing include re-running previously run tests and checking whether previously fixed faults have re-emerged.
Contents |
[edit] Background
Experience has shown that as software is developed, this kind of reemergence of faults is quite common. Sometimes it occurs because a fix gets lost through poor revision control practices (or simple human error in revision control), but often a fix for a problem will be "fragile" in that it fixes the problem in the narrow case where it was first observed but not in more general cases which may arise over the lifetime of the software. Finally, it has often been the case that when some feature is redesigned, the same mistakes will be made in the redesign that were made in the original implementation of the feature.
Therefore, in most software development situations it is considered good practice that when a bug is located and fixed, a test that exposes the bug is recorded and regularly retested after subsequent changes to the program. Although this may be done through manual testing procedures using programming techniques, it is often done using automated testing tools. Such a test suite contains software tools that allow the testing environment to execute all the regression test cases automatically; some projects even set up automated systems to automatically re-run all regression tests at specified intervals and report any failures (which could imply a regression or an out-of-date test). Common strategies are to run such a system after every successful compile (for small projects), every night, or once a week. Those strategies can be automated by an external tool, such as BuildBot.
Regression testing is an integral part of the extreme programming software development method. In this method, design documents are replaced by extensive, repeatable, and automated testing of the entire software package at every stage in the software development cycle.
[edit] Regression test generation
Effective regression tests generate sufficient code execution coverage to exercise all meaningful code branches. Therefore, software testing is a combinatorial problem. However, in practice many combinations are unreachable so the problem size is greatly reduced. Every boolean decision statement requires at least two tests: one with an outcome of "true" and one with an outcome of "false". As a result, for every line of code written, programmers often need 3 to 5 lines of test code.[1]
Traditionally, in the corporate world, regression testing has been performed by a software quality assurance team after the development team has completed work. However, defects found at this stage are the most costly to fix. This problem is being addressed by the rise of developer testing. Although developers have always written test cases as part of the development cycle, these test cases have generally been either functional tests or unit tests that verify only intended outcomes. Developer testing compels a developer to focus on unit testing and to include both positive and negative test cases.[2]
[edit] Uses
Regression testing can be used not only for testing the correctness of a program, but often also for tracking the quality of its output. For instance, in the design of a compiler, regression testing should track the code size, simulation time and time of the test suite cases.
[edit] Quotes
- "Also as a consequence of the introduction of new bugs, program maintenance requires far more system testing per statement written than any other programming. Theoretically, after each fix one must run the entire batch of test cases previously run against the system, to ensure that it has not been damaged in an obscure way. In practice, such regression testing must indeed approximate this theoretical idea, and it is very costly." -- Fred Brooks, The Mythical Man Month (p 122)
[edit] See also
- Characterization test
- Quality control
- Software development process
- Software testing
- Smoke testing
- Unit testing
[edit] Notes
- ^ Cramblitt, Bob (2007-09-20). "Alberto Savoia sings the praises of software testing". http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid92_gci1273161,00.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-29.
- ^ Dudney, Bill (2004-12-08). "Developer Testing Is 'In': An interview with Alberto Savoia and Kent Beck". http://www.sys-con.com/read/47359.htm. Retrieved on 2007-11-29.
[edit] References
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2007) |
- Nada daVeiga: Change Code Without Fear: Utilize a Regression Safety Net DDJ, February, 2008
- Adam Kolawa: Want to Automate Regression Testing? Get Development and QA in Sync STP, January, 2008
- Adam Kolawa: Regression Testing, Programmer to Programmer.
- Ramzi A. Haraty: Regression testing of database applications, Journal of Database Management, April 1, 2002, Volume 13, Issue 2.
- Sal Mangano: Using XSLT to Assist Regression Testing, xml.com
- Elfriede Dustin: Automate Regression Tests When Feasible, Automated Testing: Selected Best Practices, Safari Books Online.
- Savoia, Alberto (2007). "Beautiful Tests". Beautiful Code. O'Reilly. http://www.junitfactory.com/articles/beautiful-code/BeautifulTests.pdf. Retrieved on 2007-11-29.