S.M.A.R.T.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2009) |
Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology, or S.M.A.R.T. (sometimes written as SMART), is a monitoring system for computer hard disks to detect and report on various indicators of reliability, in the hope of anticipating failures.
Contents |
[edit] Background
Fundamentally, hard-drive failures fall into one of two basic classes:
- Predictable failures
These types of failures happen gradually over time, such as mechanical wear and gradual degradation of storage surfaces. A monitoring device can detect these problems, much as a temperature dial on a vehicle's dashboard can warn a driver that the engine has started to overheat. These devices (in this case a thermometer) monitor the status of such object which helps to prevent any problems that might arise before it is too late to fix said object.
- Unpredictable failures will happen suddenly and without warning. These failures range from defective electronic components to a sudden mechanical failure (perhaps due to improper handling).
Mechanical failures account for about 60 percent of all drive failures.[1] Most mechanical failures result from gradual wear, although an eventual failure may be catastrophic. However, before complete failure occurs, there are usually certain indications that failure is imminent. These may include increased heat output, increased noise level, problems with reading and writing of data, an increase in the number of damaged disk sectors, and so on.
The purpose of S.M.A.R.T. is to warn a user or system administrator of impending drive failure while there is still time to take preventative action, such as copying the data to a replacement device. Approximately 64% of failures can be predicted by S.M.A.R.T.[2] Work at Google on over 100,000 drives has shown little overall predictive value of S.M.A.R.T. status as a whole, but suggests that certain sub-categories of information which some S.M.A.R.T. implementations track do correlate with actual failure rates – specifically, in the 60 days following the first scan error on a drive, the drive is, on average, 39 times more likely to fail than it would have been had no such error occurred. Also, first errors in reallocations, offline reallocations and probational counts are strongly correlated to higher probabilities of failure.[3]
PCTechGuide's page on S.M.A.R.T. (2003)[4] comments that the technology has gone through three phases:
- "In its original incarnation SMART provided failure prediction by monitoring certain online hard drive activities. A subsequent version improved failure prediction by adding an automatic off-line read scan to monitor additional operations. The latest SMART technology not only monitors hard drive activities but adds failure prevention by attempting to detect and repair sector errors. Also, whilst earlier versions of the technology only monitored hard drive activity for data that was retrieved by the operating system, this latest SMART tests all data and all sectors of a drive by using "off-line data collection" to confirm the drive's health during periods of inactivity."
[edit] History and predecessors
The industry's first hard disk monitoring technology was introduced by IBM in 1992 in their IBM 9337 Disk Arrays for AS/400 servers using IBM 0662 SCSI-2 disk drives.[5] Later it was named Predictive Failure Analysis (PFA) technology. It was measuring several key device health parameters and evaluating them within the drive firmware. Communications between the physical unit and the monitoring software were limited to a binary result – namely, either "device is OK" or "drive is likely to fail soon".
Later, another variant, which was named IntelliSafe, was created by computer manufacturer Compaq and disk drive manufacturers Seagate, Quantum, and Conner [6]. The disk drives would measure the disk’s "health parameters", and the values would be transferred to the operating system and user-space monitoring software. Each disk drive vendor was free to decide which parameters were to be included for monitoring, and what their thresholds should be. The unification was at the protocol level with the host.
Compaq submitted their implementation to Small Form Committee for standardization in early 1995.[7] It was supported by IBM, by Compaq's development partners Seagate, Quantum, and Conner, and by Western Digital, who did not have a failure prediction system at the time. The Committee chose IntelliSafe's approach, as it provided more flexibility. The resulting jointly developed standard was named S.M.A.R.T.
[edit] S.M.A.R.T. information
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of |
The technical documentation for SMART is in the AT Attachment (ATA) standard.[8]
The most basic information that SMART provides is the SMART status. It provides only two values: "threshold not exceeded" and "threshold exceeded". Often these are represented as "drive OK" or "drive fail" respectively. A "threshold exceeded" value is intended to indicate that there is a relatively high probability that the drive will not be able to honour its specification in the future – that is, the drive is "about to fail". The predicted failure may be catastrophic or may be something as subtle as the inability to write to certain sectors, or perhaps slower performance than the manufacturer's declared minimum.
The SMART status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past or present reliability. If a drive has already failed catastrophically, the SMART status may be inaccessible. Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but the sensors no longer detect such problems, the SMART status may, depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is now sound.
The inability to read some sectors is not always an indication that a drive is about to fail. One way that unreadable sectors may be created, even when the drive is functioning within specification, is through a sudden power failure while the drive is writing. In order to prevent this problem, modern hard drives will always finish writing at least the current sector immediately after the power fails (typically using rotational energy from the disk). Also, even if the physical disk is damaged at one location, such that a certain sector is unreadable, the disk may be able to use spare space to replace the bad area, so that the sector can be overwritten.[9]
More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining the SMART Attributes. SMART Attributes were included in some drafts of the ATA standard, but were removed before the standard became final. The meaning and interpretation of the attributes varies between manufacturers, and are sometimes considered a trade secret for one manufacturer or another. Attributes are further discussed below.[10]
Drives with SMART may optionally support a number of 'logs'. The error log records information about the most recent errors that the drive has reported back to the host computer. Examining this log may help one to determine whether computer problems are disk-related or caused by something else.
A drive supporting SMART may optionally support a number of self-test or maintenance routines, and the results of the tests are kept in the self-test log. The self-test routines may be used to detect any unreadable sectors on the disk, so that they may be restored from back-up sources (for example, from other disks in a RAID). This helps to reduce the risk of incurring permanent loss of data.
[edit] Standards and implementation
Many motherboards will display a warning message when a disk drive is approaching failure. Although an industry standard among most major hard drive manufacturers,[11] there are some remaining issues and much proprietary "secret knowledge" held by individual manufacturers as to their specific approach. As a result, S.M.A.R.T. is not always implemented correctly on many computer platforms, due to the absence of industry-wide software & hardware standards for S.M.A.R.T. data interchange.[citation needed]
From a legal perspective, the term "S.M.A.R.T." refers only to a signalling method between internal disk drive electromechanical sensors and the host computer. Hence, a drive may be claimed by its manufacturers to include S.M.A.R.T. support even if it does not include, say, a temperature sensor, which the customer might reasonably expect to be present. Moreover, in the most extreme case, a disk manufacturer could, in theory, produce a drive which includes a sensor for just one physical attribute, and then legally advertise the product as "S.M.A.R.T. compatible".
Depending on the type of interface being used, some S.M.A.R.T.-enabled motherboards and related software may not communicate with certain S.M.A.R.T.-capable drives. For example, few external drives connected via USB and Firewire correctly send S.M.A.R.T. data over those interfaces. With so many ways to connect a hard drive (SCSI, Fibre Channel, ATA, SATA, SAS, SSA, and so on), it is difficult to predict whether S.M.A.R.T. reports will function correctly in a given system.
Even on hard drives and interfaces that support it, S.M.A.R.T. information may not be reported correctly to the computer's operating system. Some disk controllers can duplicate all write operations on a secondary "back-up" drive in real time. This feature is known as "RAID mirroring". However, many programs which are designed to analyze changes in drive behaviour and relay S.M.A.R.T. alerts to the operator do not function properly when a computer system is configured for RAID support. Generally this is because, under normal RAID operational conditions, the computer is not permitted by the RAID subsystem to 'see' (or directly access) individual physical drives, but may access only logical volumes instead.
On the Windows platform, many programs designed to monitor and report S.M.A.R.T. information will function only under an administrator account. At present, S.M.A.R.T. is implemented individually by manufacturers, and while some aspects are standardized for compatibility, others are not.
[edit] ATA S.M.A.R.T. attributes
Each drive manufacturer defines a set of attributes, and sets threshold values beyond which attributes should not pass under normal operation. Each attribute has a raw value, whose meaning is entirely up to the drive manufacturer (but often corresponds to counts or a physical unit, such degrees Celsius or seconds), and a normalized value, which ranges from 1 to 253 (with 1 representing the worst case and 253 representing the best). Depending on the manufacturer, a value of 100 or 200 will often be chosen as the "normal" value.
Manufacturers that have supported at least one S.M.A.R.T. attribute in various products include: Samsung, Seagate, IBM (Hitachi), Fujitsu, Maxtor, Toshiba, Western Digital and ExcelStor Technology.
[edit] Known ATA S.M.A.R.T. attributes
This article may contain original research or unverified claims. Please improve the article by adding references. See the talk page for details. (September 2007) |
The following chart lists some S.M.A.R.T. attributes and the typical meaning of their raw values. Normalized values are always mapped so that higher values are better (with only very rare exceptions such as the "Temperature" attribute on certain Seagate drives[12]), but higher raw attribute values may be better or worse depending on the attribute and manufacturer. For example, the "Reallocated Sectors Count" attribute's normalized value decreases as the number of reallocated sectors increases. In this case, the attribute's raw value will often indicate the actual number of sectors that were reallocated, although vendors are in no way required to adhere to this convention. As manufacturers do not necessarily agree on precise attribute definitions and measurement units, the following list of attributes should be regarded as a general guide only.
Legend | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential indicators of imminent electromechanical failure |
ID | Hex | Attribute name | Better | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
01 | 01 | Read Error Rate |
|
Indicates the rate of hardware read errors that occurred when reading data from a disk surface. A non-zero value indicates a problem with either the disk surface or read/write heads. Note that Seagate drives often report a raw value that is very high even on new drives, and does not thereby indicate a failure. |
02 | 02 | Throughput Performance |
|
Overall (general) throughput performance of a hard disk drive. If the value of this attribute is decreasing there is a high probability that there is a problem with the disk. |
03 | 03 | Spin-Up Time |
|
Average time of spindle spin up (from zero RPM to fully operational [millisecs]). |
04 | 04 | Start/Stop Count | A tally of spindle start/stop cycles. The spindle turns on, and hence the count is increased, both when the hard disk is turned on after having before been turned entirely off (disconnected from power source) and when the hard disk returns from having previously been put to sleep mode. [13] | |
05 | 05 | Reallocated Sectors Count |
|
Count of reallocated sectors. When the hard drive finds a read/write/verification error, it marks this sector as "reallocated" and transfers data to a special reserved area (spare area). This process is also known as remapping, and "reallocated" sectors are called remaps. This is why, on modern hard disks, "bad blocks" cannot be found while testing the surface – all bad blocks are hidden in reallocated sectors. However, as the number of reallocated sectors increases, the read/write speed tends to decrease. The raw value normally represents a count of the number of bad sectors that have been found and remapped. Thus, the higher the attribute value, the more sectors the drive has had to reallocate. |
06 | 06 | Read Channel Margin | Margin of a channel while reading data. The function of this attribute is not specified. | |
07 | 07 | Seek Error Rate |
|
Rate of seek errors of the magnetic heads. If there is a partial failure in the mechanical positioning system, then seek errors will arise. Such a failure may be due to numerous factors, such as damage to a servo, or thermal widening of the hard disk. More seek errors indicates a worsening condition of a disk’s surface or the mechanical subsystem, or both. Note that Seagate drives often report a raw value that is very high, even on new drives, and this does not normally indicate a failure.[citation needed] |
08 | 08 | Seek Time Performance |
|
Average performance of seek operations of the magnetic heads. If this attribute is decreasing, it is a sign of problems in the mechanical subsystem. |
09 | 09 | Power-On Hours (POH) |
|
Count of hours in power-on state. The raw value of this attribute shows total count of hours (or minutes, or seconds, depending on manufacturer) in power-on state. |
10 | 0A | Spin Retry Count |
|
Count of retry of spin start attempts. This attribute stores a total count of the spin start attempts to reach the fully operational speed (under the condition that the first attempt was unsuccessful). An increase of this attribute value is a sign of problems in the hard disk mechanical subsystem. |
11 | 0B | Recalibration Retries |
|
This attribute indicates the number of times recalibration was requested (under the condition that the first attempt was unsuccessful). An increase of this attribute value is a sign of problems in the hard disk mechanical subsystem. |
12 | 0C | Power Cycle Count | This attribute indicates the count of full hard disk power on/off cycles. | |
13 | 0D | Soft Read Error Rate |
|
Uncorrected read errors reported to the operating system. |
184 | B8 | End-to-End error |
|
This attribute is a part of HP's SMART IV technology and it means that after transferring through the cache RAM data buffer the parity data between the host and the hard drive did not match. |
187 | BB | Reported Uncorrectable Errors |
|
A number of errors that could not be recovered using hardware ECC (see attribute 195). |
188 | BC | Command Timeout |
|
A number of aborted operations due to HDD timeout. Normally this attribute value should be equal to zero and if you have values far above zero, then most likely you have some serious problems with your power supply or you have an oxidized data cable. |
189 | BD | High Fly Writes |
|
HDD producers implement a Fly Height Monitor that attempts to provide additional protections for write operations by detecting when a recording head is flying outside its normal operating range. If an unsafe fly height condition is encountered, the write process is stopped, and the information is rewritten or reallocated to a safe region of the hard drive. This attribute indicates the count of these errors detected over the lifetime of the drive.
This feature is implemented in most modern Seagate drives[citation needed] and some of Western Digital’s drives, beginning with the WD Enterprise WDE18300 and WDE9180 Ultra2 SCSI hard drives, and will be included on all future WD Enterprise products.[14] |
190 | BE | Airflow Temperature (WDC) |
|
Airflow temperature on Western Digital HDs (Same as temp. [C2], but current value is 50 less for some models. Marked as obsolete.) |
190 | BE | Temperature Difference from 100 |
|
Value is equal to (100 – temp. °C), allowing manufacturer to set a minimum threshold which corresponds to a maximum temperature.
(Seagate only?)[citation needed] |
191 | BF | G-sense error rate |
|
Frequency of mistakes as a result of impact loads[citation needed] |
192 | C0 | Power-off Retract Count |
|
Number of times the heads are loaded off the media. Heads can be unloaded without actually powering off.[citation needed] (or Emergency Retract Cycle count – Fujitsu)[15] |
193 | C1 | Load/Unload Cycle Count |
|
Count of load/unload cycles into head landing zone position.[16] |
194 | C2 | Temperature |
|
Current internal temperature. |
195 | C3 | Hardware ECC Recovered |
|
Time between ECC-corrected errors[citation needed] or number of ECC on-the-fly errors. Sources differ on this point.[17] |
196 | C4 | Reallocation Event Count |
|
Count of remap operations. The raw value of this attribute shows the total number of attempts to transfer data from reallocated sectors to a spare area. Both successful & unsuccessful attempts are counted. |
197 | C5 | Current Pending Sector Count |
|
Number of "unstable" sectors (waiting to be remapped). If the unstable sector is subsequently written or read successfully, this value is decreased and the sector is not remapped. Read errors on the sector will not remap the sector, it will only be remapped on a failed write attempt. This can be problematic to test because cached writes will not remap the sector, only direct I/O writes to the disk. |
198 | C6 | Uncorrectable Sector Count |
|
The total number of uncorrectable errors when reading/writing a sector. A rise in the value of this attribute indicates defects of the disk surface and/or problems in the mechanical subsystem. (or Off-Line Scan Uncorrectable Sector Count – Fujitsu)[15] |
199 | C7 | UltraDMA CRC Error Count |
|
The number of errors in data transfer via the interface cable as determined by ICRC (Interface Cyclic Redundancy Check). |
200 | C8 | Write Error Rate / Multi-Zone Error Rate |
|
The total number of errors when writing a sector. |
201 | C9 | Soft Read Error Rate |
|
Number of off-track errors. |
202 | CA | Data Address Mark errors |
|
Number of Data Address Mark errors (or vendor-specific).[citation needed] |
203 | CB | Run Out Cancel |
|
Number of ECC errors |
204 | CC | Soft ECC Correction |
|
Number of errors corrected by software ECC[citation needed] |
205 | CD | Thermal Asperity Rate (TAR) |
|
Number of errors due to high temperaure.[18] |
206 | CE | Flying Height | Height of heads above the disk surface. A flying height that's too low increases the chances of a head crash while a flying height that's too high increases the chances of a read/write error.[citation needed] | |
207 | CF | Spin High Current |
|
Amount of surge current used to spin up the drive.[18] |
208 | D0 | Spin Buzz | Number of buzz routines needed to spin up the drive due to insufficient power.[18] | |
209 | D1 | Offline Seek Performance | Drive’s seek performance during its internal tests.[18] | |
211 | D3 | Vibration During Write | Vibration During Write[citation needed] | |
212 | D4 | Shock During Write | Shock During Write[citation needed] | |
220 | DC | Disk Shift |
|
Distance the disk has shifted relative to the spindle (usually due to shock or temperature). Unit of measure is unknown. |
221 | DD | G-Sense Error Rate |
|
The number of errors resulting from externally-induced shock & vibration. |
222 | DE | Loaded Hours | Time spent operating under data load (movement of magnetic head armature)[citation needed] | |
223 | DF | Load/Unload Retry Count | Number of times head changes position.[citation needed] | |
224 | E0 | Load Friction |
|
Resistance caused by friction in mechanical parts while operating.[citation needed] |
225 | E1 | Load/Unload Cycle Count |
|
Total number of load cycles[citation needed] |
226 | E2 | Load 'In'-time | Total time of loading on the magnetic heads actuator (time not spent in parking area).[citation needed] | |
227 | E3 | Torque Amplification Count |
|
Number of attempts to compensate for platter speed variations[citation needed] |
228 | E4 | Power-Off Retract Cycle |
|
The number of times the magnetic armature was retracted automatically as a result of cutting power.[citation needed] |
230 | E6 | GMR Head Amplitude | Amplitude of "thrashing" (distance of repetitive forward/reverse head motion)[citation needed] | |
231 | E7 | Temperature |
|
Drive Temperature |
240 | F0 | Head Flying Hours | Time while head is positioning[citation needed] | |
250 | FA | Read Error Retry Rate |
|
Number of errors while reading from a disk |
254 | FE | Free Fall Protection |
|
Number of "Free Fall Events" detected [19] |
[edit] Threshold Exceeds Condition
This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources (ideally, using inline citations). Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2007) |
Threshold Exceeds Condition (TEC) is a supposed date when a critical drive statistic attribute will reach its threshold value. When Drive Health software reports a "Nearest T.E.C.", it should be regarded as a "Failure date".
Prognosis of this date is based on the factor "Speed of attribute change"; how many points each month the value is decreasing/increasing. This factor is calculated automatically at any change of S.M.A.R.T. attributes for each attribute individually. Note that TEC dates are not guarantees; hard drives can and will either last much longer or fail much sooner than the date given by a TEC.
[edit] See also
- Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools
- http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Minimizing_hard_disk_drive_failure_and_data_loss
[edit] References
- "S.M.A.R.T. attribute meaning". PalickSoft. http://www.siguardian.com/products/siguardian/on_line_help/s_m_a_r_t_attribute_meaning.html. Retrieved on February 3 2006.
- Zbigniew Chlondowski. "S.M.A.R.T. Site: attributes reference table". S.M.A.R.T. Linux. http://smartlinux.sourceforge.net/smart/attributes.php. Retrieved on January 17.
- "S.M.A.R.T. attributes meaning". Ariolic Software, Ltd. 2007. http://www.ariolic.com/activesmart/smart-attributes/. Retrieved on October 26 2007.
- "Can we believe S.M.A.R.T. ? – How hard disk S.M.A.R.T. really works". H.D.S. Hungary. 2007. http://www.hdsentinel.com/smart. Retrieved on June 4 2008.
- ^ Seagate statement on enhanced smart attributes
- ^ How does S.M.A.R.T. work?
- ^ Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population (Conclusion section), by Eduardo Pinheiro, Wolf-Dietrich Weber and Luiz André Barroso, Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy Mountain View, CA 94043
- ^ PCTechGuide's page on S.M.A.R.T. (2003)
- ^ IBM Announcement Letter No. ZG92-0289 dated September 1, 1992
- ^ Seagate – The evolution of S.M.A.R.T.
- ^ Compaq. IntelliSafe. Technical Report SSF-8035, Small Form Committee, January 1995.
- ^ Stephens, Curtis E, ed. (December 11, 2006), Information technology – AT Attachment 8 – ATA/ATAPI Command Set (ATA8-ACS), working draft revision 3f, ANSI INCITS, pp. 198–213, 327-344, http://www.t13.org/Documents/UploadedDocuments/docs2006/D1699r3f-ATA8-ACS.pdf
- ^ Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (19 September 2003), Hard Disk Drive Specification: Hitachi Travelstar 80GN, revision 2.0, Hitachi Document Part Number S13K-1055-20, http://www.hitachigst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/85CC1FF9F3F11FE187256C4F0052E6B6/$file/80GNSpec2.0.pdf
- ^ Hatfield, Jim (September 30, 2005), SMART Attribute Annex, e05148r0, http://www.t13.org/Documents/UploadedDocuments/docs2005/e05148r0-ACS-SMARTAttributesAnnex.pdf
- ^ pctechguide: "Industry acceptance of PFA technology eventually led to SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) becoming the industry-standard reliability prediction indicator..." [1]
- ^ smartmontools FAQ ("Attribute 194 (Temperature Celsius) behaves strangely on my Seagate disk")
- ^ Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology (SMART) :: Article, 2009-03-10, http://smartlinux.sourceforge.net/smart/article.php
- ^ Fly Height Monitor Improves Hard Drive Reliability, Western Digital, April 1999, 79-850123-000, http://www.wdc.com/en/library/2579-850123.pdf
- ^ a b Fujitsu MHT2080AT, MHT2060AT, MHT2040AT, MHT2030AT, MHG2020AT Disk Drives Product Manual, Fujitsu Limited, 2003-07-04, p. 5-73, C141-E192-02EN, http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/COMP/fcpa/hdd/discontinued/mht20xxat_prod-manual.pdf
- ^ Fujitsu MHT2080AT, MHT2060AT, MHT2040AT, MHT2030AT, MHG2020AT Disk Drives Product Manual, Fujitsu Limited, 2003-07-04, p. 1-11, C141-E192-02EN, http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/COMP/fcpa/hdd/discontinued/mht20xxat_prod-manual.pdf
- ^ SMART Attribute Annex, 2005-10-30, p. 3, http://www.t13.org/Documents/UploadedDocuments/docs2005/e05148r0-ACS-SMARTAttributesAnnex.pdf
- ^ a b c d S.M.A.R.T. attribute list (ATA)
- ^ Seagate Technology, LLC (September 2007), Seagate Momentus 7200.2 SATA Product Manual, Publication Number: 100451238, Rev. D, Hitachi Document Part Number S13K-1055-20, http://www.seagate.com/staticfiles/support/disc/manuals/notebook/momentus/7200.2/100451238d.pdf
[edit] External links
- Out SMART Your Hard Drive Using the smartmontools program to monitor S.M.A.R.T. values
- How S.M.A.R.T. is your hard drive?
- How monitoring S.M.A.R.T. your hard drives?