Command pattern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In object-oriented programming, the Command pattern is a design pattern in which an object is used to represent and encapsulate all the information needed to call a method at a later time. This information includes the method name, the object that owns the method and values for the method parameters.

Three terms always associated with the Command pattern are client, invoker and receiver. The client instantiates the command object and provides the information required to call the method at a later time. The invoker decides when the method should be called. The receiver is an instance of the class that contains the method's code.

Using command objects makes it easier to construct general components that need to delegate, sequence or execute method calls at a time of their choosing without the need to know the owner of the method or the method parameters.

Contents

[edit] Uses for the Command pattern

Command objects are useful for implementing:

Multi-level undo 
If all user actions in a program are implemented as command objects, the program can keep a stack of the most recently executed commands. When the user wants to undo a command, the program simply pops the most recent command object and executes its undo() method.
Transactional behavior 
Undo is perhaps even more essential when it's called rollback and happens automatically when an operation fails partway through. Installers need this and so do databases. Command objects can also be used to implement two-phase commit.
Progress bars 
Suppose a program has a sequence of commands that it executes in order. If each command object has a getEstimatedDuration() method, the program can easily estimate the total duration. It can show a progress bar that meaningfully reflects how close the program is to completing all the tasks.
Wizards 
Often a wizard presents several pages of configuration for a single action that happens only when the user clicks the "Finish" button on the last page. In these cases, a natural way to separate user interface code from application code is to implement the wizard using a command object. The command object is created when the wizard is first displayed. Each wizard page stores its GUI changes in the command object, so the object is populated as the user progresses. "Finish" simply triggers a call to execute(). This way, the command class contains no user interface code.
GUI buttons and menu items 
In Swing and Borland Delphi programming, an Action is a command object. In addition to the ability to perform the desired command, an Action may have an associated icon, keyboard shortcut, tooltip text, and so on. A toolbar button or menu item component may be completely initialized using only the Action object.
Thread pools 
A typical, general-purpose thread pool class might have a public addTask() method that adds a work item to an internal queue of tasks waiting to be done. It maintains a pool of threads that execute commands from the queue. The items in the queue are command objects. Typically these objects implement a common interface such as java.lang.Runnable that allows the thread pool to execute the command even though the thread pool class itself was written without any knowledge of the specific tasks for which it would be used.
Macro recording 
If all user actions are represented by command objects, a program can record a sequence of actions simply by keeping a list of the command objects as they are executed. It can then "play back" the same actions by executing the same command objects again in sequence. If the program embeds a scripting engine, each command object can implement a toScript() method, and user actions can then be easily recorded as scripts.
Networking 
It is possible to send whole command objects across the network to be executed on the other machines, for example player actions in computer games.
Parallel Processing 
Where the commands are written as tasks to a shared resource and executed by many threads in parallel (possibly on remote machines -this variant is often referred to as the Master/Worker pattern)
Mobile Code 
Using languages such as Java where code can be streamed/slurped from one location to another via URLClassloaders and Codebases the commands can enable new behavior to be delivered to remote locations (EJB Command, Master Worker)

[edit] Structure

Image:Command_Design_Pattern_Class_Diagram.png

[edit] Terminology

The terminology used to describe command pattern implementations is not consistent and can therefore be confusing. This is the result of ambiguity, the use of synonyms, and implementations that may obscure the original pattern by going well beyond it.

  1. Ambiguity.
    1. The term command is ambiguous. For example, move up, move up may refer to a single (move up) command that should be executed twice, or it may refer to two commands, each of which happens to do the same thing (move up). If the former command is added twice to an undo stack, both items on the stack refer to the same command instance. This may be appropriate when a command can always be undone the same way (e.g. move down). Both the Gang of Four and the Java example below use this interpretation of the term command. On the other hand, if the latter commands are added to an undo stack, the stack refers to two separate objects. This may be appropriate when each object on the stack must contain information that allows the command to be undone. For example, to undo a delete selection command, the object may contain a copy of the deleted text so that it can be re-inserted if the delete selection command must be undone. The C++ example below is an example of this interpretation. Note that using a separate object for each invocation of a command is also an example of the chain of responsibility pattern.
    2. The term execute is also ambiguous. It may refer to running the code identified by the command object's execute method. However, in Microsoft's Windows Presentation Foundation a command is considered to have been executed when the command's execute method has been invoked. But that does not necessarily mean that the application code has run. That occurs only after some further event processing.
  2. Synonyms and homonyms.
    1. Client, Source, Invoker: the button, toolbar button, or menu item clicked, the shortcut key pressed by the user.
    2. Command Object, Routed Command Object, Action Object: a singleton object (e.g. there is only one CopyCommand object), which knows about shortcut keys, button images, command text, etc. related to the command. A source/invoker object calls the Command/Action object's execute/performAction method. The Command/Action object notifies the appropriate source/invoker objects when the availability of a command/action has changed. This allows buttons and menu items to become inactive (grayed out) when a command/action cannot be executed/performed.
    3. Receiver, Target Object: the object that is about to be copied, pasted, moved, etc. The receiver object owns the method that is called by the command's execute method. The receiver is typically also the target object. For example, if the receiver object is a cursor and the method is called moveUp, then one would expect that the cursor is the target of the moveUp action. At the other hand, if the code is defined by the command object itself, the target object will be a different object entirely.
    4. Command Object, routed event args, event object: the object that is passed from the source to the Command/Action object, to the Target object to the code that does the work. Each button click or shortcut key results in a new command/event object. Some implementations add more information to the command/event object as it is being passed from one object (e.g. CopyCommand) to another (e.g. document section). Other implementations put command/event objects in other event objects (like a box inside a bigger box) as they move along the line, to avoid naming conflicts. (See also chain of responsibility pattern).
    5. Handler, ExecutedRoutedEventHandler, method, function: the actual code that does the copying, pasting, moving, etc. In some implementations the handler code is part of the command/action object. In other implementations the code is part of the Receiver/Target Object, and in yet other implementations the handler code is kept separate from the other objects.
    6. Command Manager, Undo Manager, Scheduler, Queue, Dispatcher, Invoker: an object that puts command/event objects on an undo stack or redo stack, or that holds on to command/event objects until other objects are ready to act on them, or that routes the command/event objects to the appropriate receiver/target object or handler code.
  3. Implementations that go well beyond the original command pattern.
    1. Microsoft's Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), introduces routed commands, which combine the command pattern with event processing. As a result the command object no longer contains a reference to the target object nor a reference to the application code. Instead, invoking the command object's execute command results in a so called Executed Routed Event which during the event's tunneling or bubbling may encounter a so called binding object which identifies the target and the application code, which is executed at that point.

[edit] Examples

[edit] C++

Consider a simple recipe making program. Every command could be represented as an object. Then if the user makes a mistake then he/she can undo the command by removing that object from the stack

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
 
class Command{
  public:
   virtual void execute(void) =0;
   virtual ~Command(void){};
};
 
class Ingredient : public Command {
  public:
   Ingredient(string amount, string ingredient){
      _ingredient = ingredient;
      _amount = amount;
   }
   void execute(void){
      cout << " *Add " << _amount << " of " << _ingredient << endl;
   }
  private:
   string _ingredient;
   string _amount;
};
 
class Step : public Command {
  public:
   Step(string action, string time){
      _action= action;
      _time= time;
   }
   void execute(void){
      cout << " *" << _action << " for " << _time << endl;
   }
  private:
   string _time;
   string _action;
};
 
class CmdStack{
  public:
   void add(Command *c) {
      commands.push_back(c);
   }
   void createRecipe(void){
      for(vector<Command*>::size_type x=0;x<commands.size();x++){
         commands[x]->execute();
      }
   }
   void undo(void){
      if(commands.size() > 0) {
         commands.pop_back();
      }
      else {
         cout << "Can't undo" << endl;
      }
   }
  private:
   vector<Command*> commands;
};
 
int main(void) {
   CmdStack list;
 
   //Create ingredients
   Ingredient first("2 tablespoons", "vegetable oil");
   Ingredient second("3 cups", "rice");
   Ingredient third("1 bottle","Ketchup");
   Ingredient fourth("4 ounces", "peas");
   Ingredient fifth("1 teaspoon", "soy sauce");
 
   //Create Step
   Step step("Stir-fry","3-4 minutes");
 
   //Create Recipe
   cout << "Recipe for simple Fried Rice" << endl;
   list.add(&first);
   list.add(&second);
   list.add(&step);
   list.add(&third); 
   list.undo();
   list.add(&fourth);
   list.add(&fifth);
   list.createRecipe();
   cout << "Enjoy!" << endl;
   return 0;
}

[edit] Java

Consider a simple switch. In this example we configure the Switch with 2 commands: to turn the light on and to turn the light off.

A benefit of this particular implementation of the Command Pattern is that the switch can be used with any device, not just a light - the Switch in the following example turns a light on and off, but the Switch's constructor is able to accept any subclasses of Command for its 2 parameters. For example, you could configure the Switch to start an engine.

/*the Invoker class*/
public class Switch {
 
    private Command flipUpCommand;
    private Command flipDownCommand;
 
    public Switch(Command flipUpCmd,Command flipDownCmd){
         this.flipUpCommand=flipUpCmd;
         this.flipDownCommand=flipDownCmd;
    }
 
    public void flipUp(){
         flipUpCommand.execute();
    }
 
    public void flipDown(){
         flipDownCommand.execute();
    }
 
}
 
/*Receiver class*/
 
public class Light{
 
     public Light(){  }
 
     public void turnOn(){
        System.out.println("The light is on");
     }
 
     public void turnOff(){
        System.out.println("The light is off");
     }
 
}
 
 
/*the Command interface*/
 
public interface Command{
    void execute();
}
 
 
/*the Command for turning on the light*/
 
public class TurnOnLightCommand implements Command{
 
   private Light theLight;
 
   public TurnOnLightCommand(Light light){
        this.theLight=light;
       }
 
   public void execute(){
      theLight.turnOn();
   }
 
}
 
/*the Command for turning off the light*/
 
public class TurnOffLightCommand implements Command{
 
   private Light theLight;
 
   public TurnOffLightCommand(Light light){
        this.theLight=light;
       }
 
   public void execute(){
      theLight.turnOff();
   }
 
}
 
/*The test class*/
public class TestCommand{
 
   public static void main(String[] args){
       Light l=new Light();
       Command switchUp=new TurnOnLightCommand(l);
       Command switchDown=new TurnOffLightCommand(l);
 
       Switch s=new Switch(switchUp,switchDown);
 
       s.flipUp();
       s.flipDown();
   }
 
}

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links


v • d • e
Design patterns in the book Design Patterns
Creational
Structural
Behavioral
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_pattern"
Personal tools