Computational learning theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In theoretical computer science, computational learning theory is a mathematical field related to the analysis of machine learning algorithms.

Contents

[edit] Overview

Theoretical results in machine learning mainly deal with a type of inductive learning called supervised learning. In supervised learning, an algorithm is given examples that are labeled in some useful way. For example, the examples might be descriptions of mushrooms, and the labels could be whether or not the mushrooms are edible. The algorithm takes these previously labeled examples and uses them to induce a classifier. This classifier is a function that assigns labels to examples including examples that have never been previously seen by the algorithm. The goal of the supervised learning algorithm is to optimize some measure of performance such as minimizing the number of mistakes made on new examples.

In addition to performance bounds, computational learning theorists study the time complexity and feasibility of learning. In computational learning theory, a computation is considered feasible if it can be done in polynomial time. There are two kinds of time complexity results:

  • Positive results --- Showing that a certain class of functions is learnable in polynomial time.
  • Negative results - Showing that certain classes cannot be learned in polynomial time.

Negative results are proven only by assumption. The assumptions that are common in negative results are:

There are several different approaches to computational learning theory. These differences are based on making assumptions about the inference principles used to generalize from limited data. This includes different definitions of probability (see frequency probability, Bayesian probability) and different assumptions on the generation of examples. The different approaches include:

Computational learning theory has led to several practical algorithms. For example, PAC theory inspired boosting, VC theory led to support vector machines, and Bayesian inference led to belief networks (by Judea Pearl).

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] Surveys

  • Angluin, D. 1992. Computational learning theory: Survey and selected bibliography. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (May 1992), pp. 351--369. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=129712.129746
  • D. Haussler. Probably approximately correct learning. In AAAI-90 Proceedings of the Eight National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA, pages 1101--1108. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1990. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/haussler90probably.html

[edit] VC dimension

  • V. Vapnik and A. Chervonenkis. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 16(2):264--280, 1971.

[edit] Feature selection

[edit] Inductive inference

  • E. M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447--474, 1967.

[edit] Optimal O notation learning

[edit] Negative results

  • M. Kearns and L. G. Valiant. 1989. Cryptographic limitations on learning boolean formulae and finite automata. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 433--444, New York. ACM. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/kearns89cryptographic.html

[edit] Boosting

[edit] Occam's Razor

  • Blumer, A.; Ehrenfeucht, A.; Haussler, D.; Warmuth, M. K. "Occam's razor" Inf.Proc.Lett. 24, 377-380, 1987.
  • A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler, and M. K. Warmuth. Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. Journal of the ACM, 36(4):929--865, 1989.

[edit] Probably approximately correct learning

  • L. Valiant. A Theory of the Learnable. Communications of the ACM, 27(11):1134--1142, 1984.

[edit] Error tolerance

[edit] Equivalence

  • D.Haussler, M.Kearns, N.Littlestone and M. Warmuth, Equivalence of models for polynomial learnability, Proc. 1st ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, (1988) 42-55.
  • L. Pitt and M. K. Warmuth: Prediction preserving reduction, Journal of Computer System and Science 41, 430--467, 1990.

A description of some of these publications is given at important publications in machine learning.

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Languages