From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Photovoltaic 'tree' in Styria, Austria
Renewable energy
Wind Turbine
Hydro power
Solar power
Tidal power
Wave power
Wind power

Photovoltaics (PV) is the field of technology and research related to the application of solar cells for energy by converting sunlight directly into electricity. Due to the growing demand for clean sources of energy, the manufacture of solar cells and photovoltaic arrays has expanded dramatically in recent years.[1][2][3]

Photovoltaic production has been doubling every two years, increasing by an average of 48 percent each year since 2002, making it the world’s fastest-growing energy technology.[4] At the end of 2008, according to preliminary data, cumulative global installations reached 15,200 megawatts.[5] Roughly 90% of this generating capacity consists of grid-tied electrical systems. Such installations may be ground-mounted (and sometimes integrated with farming and grazing) [6] or built into the roof or walls of a building, known as Building Integrated Photovoltaic or BIPV for short.[7]

Net metering and financial incentives, such as preferential feed-in tariffs for solar-generated electricity, have supported solar PV installations in many countries including Australia, Germany, Israel,[8] Japan, and the United States.[1]


[edit] Overview

Photovoltaic cells produce electricity directly from sunlight
Average solar irradiance, watts per square metre. Note that this is for a horizontal surface, whereas solar panels are normally propped up at an angle and receive more energy per unit area. The small black dots show the area of solar panels needed to generate all of the worlds energy using 8% eff. PVs.
Map of solar electricity potential in Europe

Photovoltaics are best known as a method for generating electric power by using solar cells packaged in photovoltaic modules, often electrically connected in multiples as solar photovoltaic arrays to convert energy from the sun into electricity. To explain the photovoltaic solar panel more simply, photons from sunlight knock electrons into a higher state of energy, thereby creating electricity. The term photovoltaic denotes the unbiased operating mode of a photodiode in which current through the device is entirely due to the transduced light energy. Virtually all photovoltaic devices are some type of photodiode.

Solar cells produce direct current electricity from light, which can be used to power equipment or to recharge a battery. The first practical application of photovoltaics was to power orbiting satellites and other spacecraft, but today the majority of photovoltaic modules are used for grid connected power generation. In this case an inverter is required to convert the DC to AC. There is a smaller market for off grid power for remote dwellings, roadside emergency telephones, remote sensing, and cathodic protection of pipelines.

Cells require protection from the environment and are usually packaged tightly behind a glass sheet. When more power is required than a single cell can deliver, cells are electrically connected together to form photovoltaic modules, or solar panels. A single module is enough to power an emergency telephone, but for a house or a power plant the modules must be arranged in arrays. Although the selling price of modules is still too high to compete with grid electricity in most places, significant financial incentives in Japan and then Germany and Italy triggered a huge growth in demand, followed quickly by production.

Perhaps not unexpectedly, a significant market has emerged in off-grid locations for solar-power-charged storage-battery based solutions. These often provide the only electricity available.[9]

The EPIA/Greenpeace Advanced Scenario shows that by the year 2030, PV systems could be generating approximately 2,600 TWh of electricity around the world. This means that, assuming a serious commitment is made to energy efficiency, enough solar power would be produced globally in twenty-five years’ time to satisfy the electricity needs of almost 14% of the world’s population.[10]

[edit] Current development

The most important issue with solar panels is capital cost (installation and materials). Newer alternatives to standard crystalline silicon modules including casting wafers instead of sawing,[11] thin film (CdTe[12] CIGS,[13] amorphous Si,[14] microcrystalline Si), concentrator modules, 'Sliver' cells, and continuous printing processes. Due to economies of scale solar panels get less costly as people use and buy more — as manufacturers increase production to meet demand, the cost and price is expected to drop in the years to come. By early 2006, the average cost per installed watt for a residential sized system was about USD 7.50 to USD 9.50, including panels, inverters, mounts, and electrical items.[15]

In 2006 investors began offering free solar panel installation in return for a 25 year contract, or Power Purchase Agreement, to purchase electricity at a fixed price, normally set at or below current electric rates.[16][17] It is expected that by 2009 over 90% of commercial photovoltaics installed in the United States will be installed using a power purchase agreement.[18] An innovative financing arrangement is being tested in Berkeley, California, which adds an amount to the property assessment to allow the city to pay for the installed panels up front, which the homeowner pays for over a 20 year period at a rate equal to the annual electric bill savings, thus allowing free installation for the homeowner at no cost to the city.[19]

The current market leader in solar panel efficiency (measured by energy conversion ratio) is SunPower, a San Jose based company. Sunpower's cells have a conversion ratio of 23.4%, well above the market average of 12-18%.[20] However, advances past this efficiency mark are being pursued in academia and R&D labs with efficiencies of 42% achieved at the University of Delaware in conjunction with DuPont.[21]

[edit] Worldwide installed totals

World solar photovoltaic (PV) installations were 2.826 gigawatts peak (GWp) in 2007, and 5.95 gigawatts in 2008, a 110% increase.[22][23]

The three leading countries (Germany, Japan and the USA) represent nearly 89% of the total worldwide PV installed capacity. On Wed 1 August 2007, word was published of construction of a production facility in China, which is projected to be one of the largest wafer factories in the world, with a peak capacity of around 1,500MW.[24]

Germany was the fastest growing major PV market in the world from 2006 to 2007. By 2008, 5.337 GWp of PV was installed, or 35% of the world total.[5] The German PV industry generates over 10,000 jobs in production, distribution and installation. By the end of 2006, nearly 88% of all solar PV installations in the EU were in grid-tied applications in Germany.[1] Photovoltaic power capacity is measured as maximum power output under standardized test conditions (STC) in "Wp" (Watts peak).[25] The actual power output at a particular point in time may be less than or greater than this standardized, or "rated," value, depending on geographical location, time of day, weather conditions, and other factors.[26] Solar photovoltaic array capacity factors are typically under 25%, which is lower than many other industrial sources of electricity.[27] Therefore the 2008 installed base peak output would have provided an average output of 3.04 GW (assuming 20% × 15,200 MWp). This represented 0.15 percent of global demand at the time.[28]

Produced, Installed & Total Photovoltaic Peak Power Capacity (MWp) as of the end of 2007
Country or Region
Report Nat. Int.
Feed-in Tariff
 World 127.9 2,130 2,258 662.3 7,178 7,841 2.5–11.2 800–2,902 0–59.3
 Germany[29][30] 35 1,100 1,135 35 3,827 3,862 46.8 4.0–5.3 1,000–1,300[31] 51.8–56.8
 Japan[30][32] 1.562 208.8 210.4 90.15 1,829 1,919 15 2.96 1,200–1,600 Ended(2005)
 United States[30][33] 55 151.5 206.5 325 505.5 830.5 2.8 2.98 900–2,150[31] 1.2–31.04(CA)
 Spain ?[30] 22 490 512 29.8 625.2 655 15.1 3.0–4.5 1,600–2,200 18.38–44.04
 Italy[30][34] 0.3 69.9 70.2 13.1 107.1 120.2 2.1 3.2–3.6 1,400–2,200 36.0–49.0
 Australia[30][35] 5.91 6.28 12.19 66.45 16.04 82.49 4.1 4.5–5.4 1,450–2,902[36] 0–26.4(SA'08)
 South Korea[30][37] 0 42.87 42.87 5.943 71.66 77.60 1.6 3.50–3.84 1,500–1,600 56.5–59.3
 France[30][38] 0.993 30.31 31.30 22.55 52.68 75.23 1.2 3.2–5.1 1,100–2,000 30.0–55.0
 Netherlands[30][39] 0.582 1.023 1.605 5.3 48 53.3 3.3 3.3–4.5 1,000–1,200 1.21–9.7
 Switzerland[30][40] 0.2 6.3 6.5 3.6 32.6 36.2 4.9 3.18–3.30 1,200–2,000 9.53–50.8
 Austria ?[30] 0.055 2.061 2.116 3.224 24.48 27.70 3.4 3.6–4.3 1,200–2,000 >0
 Canada[30][41] 3.888 1.403 5.291 22.86 2.911 25.78 0.8 3.76 900–1,750 0–29.48(ON)
 Mexico ?[30] 0.869 0.15 1.019 20.45 0.3 20.75 0.2 5.44–6.42 1,700–2,600 None
 United Kingdom[30][42] 0.16 3.65 3.81 1.47 16.62 18.09 0.3 3.67–5.72 900–1,300 0–11.74(exprt)
 Portugal ?[43] 0.2 14.25 14.45 2.841 15.03 17.87 1.7 1,600–2,200
 Norway[30][44] 0.32 0.004 0.324 7.86 0.132 7.992 1.7 11.2 800–950 None
 Sweden[30][45] 0.271 1.121 1.392 4.566 1.676 6.242 0.7 3.24–7.02 900–1,050 None
 Denmark[30][46] 0.05 0.125 0.175 0.385 2.69 3.075 0.6 5.36–8.04 900–1,100 None
 Israel[30][47] 0.5 0 0.5 1.794 0.025 1.819 0.3 4.3 2,200–2,400 13.13–16.40
Country or Region
Report Nat. Int.
Feed-in Tariff

Notes: Off grid refers to photovoltaics which are not grid connected. On grid means connected to the local electricity grid. Δ means the amount installed during the previous year. Σ means the total amount installed. Wp/capita refers to the ratio of total installed capacity divided by total population, or total installed Wp per person. Module price is average installed price, in Euros. kW·h/kWp·yr indicates the range of insolation to be expected. While National Report(s) may be cited as source(s) within an International Report, any contradictions in data are resolved by using only the most recent report's data. Exchange rates represent the 2006 annual average of daily rates (OECD Main Economic Indicators June 2007).
Module Price: Lowest:2.5 EUR/Wp[30] (2.83 USD/Wp[48]) in Germany 2003. Uncited insolation data is from maps dating 1991-1995.
PV Power (2007-June)[43][49] IEA PVPS website.

[edit] Applications

[edit] Power stations

Solar array at Nellis Air Force Base. These panels track the sun in one axis.

Several large photovoltaic power plants were completed in Spain during 2008: the Parque Fotovoltaico Olmedilla de Alarcon (60 MW), Parque Solar Merida/Don Alvaro (30 MW), Planta solar Fuente Álamo (26 MW), Planta fotovoltaica de Lucainena de las Torres (23.2 MW), Parque Fotovoltaico Abertura Solar (23.1 MW), Parque Solar Hoya de Los Vincentes (23 MW), the Solarpark Calveron (21 MW), and the Planta Solar La Magascona (20 MW).[50]

The 14 MW Nellis Solar Power Plant is the largest solar photovoltaic system in North America,[51] and is located within Nellis Air Force Base in Clark County, Nevada, on the northeast side of Las Vegas. The Nellis solar energy system will generate in excess of 25 million kilowatt-hours of electricity annually and supply more than 25 percent of the power used at the base.[52]

World's largest photovoltaic (PV) power plants[50]
Name Country DC Peak Power (MW) GW·h
Parque Fotovoltaico Olmedilla de Alarcon Spain 60 85 Completed September 2008
Parque Fotovoltaico Moura Alentejo Portugal 46 93 Completed
Parque Solar Merida/Don Alvaro Spain 30 Completed September 2008
Planta solar Fuente Álamo Spain 26 44 0.19
Planta fotovoltaica de Lucainena de las Torres Spain 23.2 Completed August 2008
Parque Fotovoltaico Abertura Solar Spain 23.1 47 0.23
Parque Solar Hoya de Los Vincentes Spain 23 41 0.20
Solarpark Calveron Spain 21.2 40 0.22
Huerta Solar Almaraz Spain 20 Completed September 2008
Planta solar fotovoltaico Calasparra Spain 20
Planta Solar La Magascona Spain 20 42 0.24
Beneixama photovoltaic power plant [53] Spain 20 30 0.17 Tenesol, Aleo and Solon solar modules with Q-Cells cells
SinAn photovoltaic power plant South Korea 19.6 27 0.16 Asia's largest photovoltaic plant. Consists of 108,864 units of Conergy STM 180F solar modules.
Planta de energía solar Mahora Spain 15 Completed September 2008
Nellis Solar Power Plant USA 14 30 0.24 70,000 solar panels
Planta Solar de Salamanca Spain 13.8 n.a. 70,000 Kyocera panels
Parque Solar Guadarranque Spain 13.6 20 0.17
Lobosillo Solar Park Spain 12.7 n.a. Chaori an YingLi modules
Parque Solar Fotovoltaico Villafranca Spain 12 High concentration PV technology
Erlasee Solar Park Germany 12 14 0.13 1,408 Solon mover
Serpa solar power plant[54] Portugal 11 20 0.21 52,000 solar modules
Pocking Solar Park Germany 10 11.5 0.13 57,912 solar modules

Topaz Solar Farm is a proposed 550 MW solar photovoltaic power plant which is to be built northwest of California Valley in the USA at a cost of over $1 billion.[55] Built on 9.5 square miles (25 km2) of ranchland,[56] the project would utilize thin-film PV panels designed and manufactured by OptiSolar in Hayward and Sacramento. The project would deliver approximately 1,100 gigawatt-hours (GW·h) annually of renewable energy. The project is expected to begin construction in 2010,[56] begin power delivery in 2011, and be fully operational by 2013.[57]

High Plains Ranch is a proposed 250 MW solar photovoltaic power plant which is to be built by SunPower in the Carrizo Plain, northwest of California Valley.[57]

[edit] In buildings

Photovoltaic solar panels on a house roof.

Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) are increasingly incorporated into new domestic and industrial buildings as a principal or ancillary source of electrical power,[58] and are one of the fastest growing segments of the photovoltaic industry.[59] Typically, an array is incorporated into the roof or walls of a building, and roof tiles with integrated PV cells can now be purchased. Arrays can also be retrofitted into existing buildings; in this case they are usually fitted on top of the existing roof structure. Alternatively, an array can be located separately from the building but connected by cable to supply power for the building.

Where a building is at a considerable distance from the public electricity supply (or grid) - in remote or mountainous areas – PV may be the preferred possibility for generating electricity, or PV may be used together with wind, diesel generators and/or hydroelectric power. In such off-grid circumstances batteries are usually used to store the electric power.

In locations near the grid, however, feeding the grid using PV panels is more practical, and leads to optimum use of the investment in the photovoltaic system. This requires both regulatory and commercial preparation, including net-metering and feed-in agreements. To provide for possible power failure, some grid tied systems are set up to allow local use disconnected from the grid. Most photovoltaics are grid connected. In the event the grid fails, the local system must not feed the grid to prevent the possible creation of dangerous islanding.

The power output of photovoltaic systems for installation in buildings is usually described in kilowatt-peak units (kWp).

[edit] In transport

PV has traditionally been used for auxiliary power in space. PV is rarely used to provide motive power in transport applications, but is being used increasingly to provide auxiliary power in boats and cars. Recent advances in solar race cars, however, have produced cars that with little changes could be used for transportation.[60]

[edit] Standalone devices

Solar parking meter.

Until a decade or so ago, PV was used frequently to power calculators and novelty devices. Improvements in integrated circuits and low power LCD displays make it possible to power such devices for several years between battery changes, making PV use less common. In contrast, solar powered remote fixed devices have seen increasing use recently in locations where significant connection cost makes grid power prohibitively expensive. Such applications include parking meters,[61] emergency telephones,[62] temporary traffic signs, and remote guard posts & signals.

[edit] Rural electrification

Developing countries where many villages are often more than five kilometers away from grid power have begun using photovoltaics. In remote locations in India a rural lighting program has been providing solar powered LED lighting to replace kerosene lamps. The solar powered lamps were sold at about the cost of a few month's supply of kerosene.[63][64] Cuba is working to provide solar power for areas that are off grid.[65] These are areas where the social costs and benefits offer an excellent case for going solar though the lack of profitability could relegate such endeavors to humanitarian goals.

[edit] Solar roadways

A 45 mi (72 km) section of roadway in Idaho is being used to test the possibility of installing solar panels into the road surface, as roads are generally unobstructed to the sun and represent about the percentage of land area needed to replace other energy sources with solar power.[66]

[edit] Economics

US average daily solar energy insolation received by a latitude tilt photovoltaic cell.

In photovoltaics, the solar value added chain is comprised of the steps from sand or raw silicon to the completed solar module and photovoltaic system completion and installation[67].

[edit] Power costs

The PV industry is beginning to adopt levelized cost of energy (LCOE) as the unit of cost. For a 10 MW plant in Phoenix, AZ, the LCOE is estimated at $0.15 to 0.22/kWh in 2005.[68]

The table below is a pure mathematical calculation. It illustrates the calculated total cost in US cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated by a photovoltaic system as function of the investment cost and the efficiency, assuming some accounting parameters such as cost of capital and depreciation period. The row headings on the left show the total cost, per peak kilowatt (kWp), of a photovoltaic installation. The column headings across the top refer to the annual energy output in kilowatt-hours expected from each installed peak kilowatt. This varies by geographic region because the average insolation depends on the average cloudiness and the thickness of atmosphere traversed by the sunlight. It also depends on the path of the sun relative to the panel and the horizon.

Panels can be mounted at an angle based on latitude,[69] or solar tracking can be utilized to access even more perpendicular sunlight, thereby raising the total energy output. The calculated values in the table reflect the total cost in cents per kilowatt-hour produced. They assume a 10% total capital cost (for instance 4% interest rate, 1% operating and maintenance cost, and depreciation of the capital outlay over 20 years).

Table showing average cost in cents/kWh over 20 years for solar power panels
Cost 2400
200 $/kWp 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.5
600 $/kWp 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.8 4.3 5.0 6.0 7.5
1000 $/kWp 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.6 6.3 7.1 8.3 10.0 12.5
1400 $/kWp 5.8 6.4 7.0 7.8 8.8 10.0 11.7 14.0 17.5
1800 $/kWp 7.5 8.2 9.0 10.0 11.3 12.9 15.0 18.0 22.5
2200 $/kWp 9.2 10.0 11.0 12.2 13.8 15.7 18.3 22.0 27.5
2600 $/kWp 10.8 11.8 13.0 14.4 16.3 18.6 21.7 26.0 32.5
3000 $/kWp 12.5 13.6 15.0 16.7 18.8 21.4 25.0 30.0 37.5
3400 $/kWp 14.2 15.5 17.0 18.9 21.3 24.3 28.3 34.0 42.5
3800 $/kWp 15.8 17.3 19.0 21.1 23.8 27.1 31.7 38.0 47.5
4200 $/kWp 17.5 19.1 21.0 23.3 26.3 30.0 35.0 42.0 52.5
4600 $/kWp 19.2 20.9 23.0 25.6 28.8 32.9 38.3 46.0 57.5
5000 $/kWp 20.8 22.7 25.0 27.8 31.3 35.7 41.7 50.0 62.5

Physicists have claimed that recent technological developments bring the cost of solar energy more in parity with that of fossil fuels. In 2007, David Faiman, the director of the Ben-Gurion National Solar Energy Center of Israel, announced that the Center had entered into a project with Zenith Solar to create a home solar energy system that uses a 10 square meter reflector dish.[70] In testing, the concentrated solar technology proved to be up to five times more cost effective than standard flat photovoltaic silicon panels, which would make it almost the same cost as oil and natural gas.[71] A prototype ready for commercialization achieved a concentration of solar energy that was more than 1,000 times greater than standard flat panels.[72]

[edit] Grid parity

Grid parity, the point at which photovoltaic electricity is equal to or cheaper than grid power, is achieved first in areas with abundant sun and high costs for electricity such as in California and Japan.[73]

Grid parity has been reached in Hawaii and other islands that otherwise use fossil fuel (diesel fuel) to produce electricity.

George W. Bush set 2015 as the date for grid parity in the USA.[74][75]. Abengoa Solar has announced the award of two R&D projects in the field of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) by the US Department of Energy that total over $14 million. The goal of the DOE R&D program, working in collaboration with partners such as Abengoa Solar, is to develop C.S.P. technologies that are competitive with conventional energy sources (grid parity) by 2015.[76]

General Electric's Chief Engineer predicts grid parity without subsidies in sunny parts of the United States by around 2015. Other companies predict an earlier date[77]: the cost of solar power will be below grid parity for more than half of residential customers and 10% of commercial customers in the OECD, as long as grid electricity prices do not decrease through 2010[78].

The fully-loaded cost (cost not price) of solar electricity is $0.25/kWh or less in most of the OECD countries. By late 2011, the fully-loaded cost is likely to fall below $0.15/kWh for most of the OECD and reach $0.10/kWh in sunnier regions. These cost levels are driving three emerging trends:[78]

  1. vertical integration of the supply chain;
  2. origination of power purchase agreements (PPAs) by solar power companies;
  3. unexpected risk for traditional power generation companies, grid operators and turbine manufacturers.

[edit] Financial incentives

The political purpose of incentive policies for PV is to facilitate an initial small-scale deployment to begin to grow the industry, even where the cost of PV is significantly above grid parity, to allow the industry to achieve the economies of scale necessary to reach grid parity. The policies are implemented to promote national energy independence, high tech job creation and reduction of CO2 emissions.

Three incentive mechanisms are used (often in combination):

  • investment subsidies: the authorities refund part of the cost of installation of the system,
  • Feed-in Tariffs (FIT)/Net metering: the electricity utility buys PV electricity from the producer under a multiyear contract at a guaranteed rate.
  • Renewable Energy Certificates ("RECs")

With investment subsidies, the financial burden falls upon the taxpayer, while with feed-in tariffs the extra cost is distributed across the utilities' customer bases. While the investment subsidy may be simpler to administer, the main argument in favour of feed-in tariffs is the encouragement of quality. Investment subsidies are paid out as a function of the nameplate capacity of the installed system and are independent of its actual power yield over time, thus rewarding the overstatement of power and tolerating poor durability and maintenance. Some electric companies offer rebates to their customers, such as Austin Energy in Texas, which offers $4.50/watt installed up to $13,500.[79]

With feed-in tariffs, the financial burden falls upon the consumer. They reward the number of kilowatt-hours produced over a long period of time, but because the rate is set by the authorities, it may result in perceived overpayment. The price paid per kilowatt-hour under a feed-in tariff exceeds the price of grid electricity. Net metering refers to the case where the price paid by the utility is the same as the price charged. Net metering is particularly important because it can be done with no changes to standard electricity meters, which accurately measure power in both directions and automatically report the difference, and because it allows homeowners and businesses to generate electricity at a different time from consumption, effectively using the grid as a giant storage battery. As more photovoltaics are used ultimately storage will need to be provided, normally in the form of pumped hydro-storage. Normally with net metering deficits are billed each month, while surpluses are rolled over to the following month and paid annually.

Where price setting by supply and demand is preferred, RECs can be used. In this mechanism, a renewable energy production or consumption target is set, and the consumer or producer is obliged to purchase renewable energy from whoever provides it the most competitively. The producer is paid via an REC. In principle this system delivers the cheapest renewable energy, since the lowest bidder will win. However, uncertainties about the future value of energy produced are a brake on investment in capacity, and the higher risk increases the cost of capital borrowed.

The Japanese government through its Ministry of International Trade and Industry ran a successful programme of subsidies from 1994 to 2003. By the end of 2004, Japan led the world in installed PV capacity with over 1.1 GW.[80]

In 2004, the German government introduced the first large-scale feed-in tariff system, under a law known as the 'EEG' (Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz) which resulted in explosive growth of PV installations in Germany. At the outset the FIT was over 3x the retail price or 8x the industrial price. The principle behind the German system is a 20 year flat rate contract. The value of new contracts is programmed to decrease each year, in order to encourage the industry to pass on lower costs to the end users. The programme has been more successful than expected with over 1GW installed in 2006, and political pressure is mounting to decrease the tariff to lessen the future burden on consumers.

Subsequently Spain, Italy, Greece and France introduced feed-in tariffs. None have replicated the programmed decrease of FIT in new contracts though, making the German incentive relatively less and less attractive compared to other countries. The French FIT offers a uniquely high premium (EUR 0.55/kWh) for building integrated systems. California, Greece, France and Italy have 30-50% more insolation than Germany making them financially more attractive.

In 2006 California approved the 'California Solar Initiative', offering a choice of investment subsidies or FIT for small and medium systems and a FIT for large systems. The small-system FIT of $0.39 per kWh (far less than EU countries) expires in just 5 years, and the alternate "EPBB" residential investment incentive is modest, averaging perhaps 20% of cost. All California incentives are scheduled to decrease in the future depending as a function of the amount of PV capacity installed.

At the end of 2006, the Ontario Power Authority (Canada) began its Standard Offer Program, the first in North America for small renewable projects (10MW or less). This guarantees a fixed price of $0.42 CDN per kWh over a period of twenty years. Unlike net metering, all the electricity produced is sold to the OPA at the SOP rate. The generator then purchases any needed electricity at the current prevailing rate (e.g., $0.055 per kWh). The difference should cover all the costs of installation and operation over the life of the contract.

The price per kilowatt hour or per peak kilowatt of the FIT or investment subsidies is only one of three factors that stimulate the installation of PV. The other two factors are insolation (the more sunshine, the less capital is needed for a given power output) and administrative ease of obtaining permits and contracts.

Unfortunately the complexity of approvals in California, Spain and Italy has prevented comparable growth to Germany even though the return on investment is better.

In some countries, additional incentives are offered for BIPV compared to stand alone PV.

  • France + EUR 0.25/kWh (EUR 0.30 + 0.25 = 0.55/kWh total)
  • Italy + EUR 0.04-0.09 kWh
  • Germany + EUR 0.05/kWh (facades only)

[edit] Environmental impacts

Unlike fossil fuel based technologies, solar power does not lead to any harmful emissions during operation, but the production of the panels leads to some amount of pollution. This is often referred to as the energy input to output ratio. In some analysis, if the energy input to produce it is higher than the output it produces it can be considered environmentally more harmful than beneficial. Also, placement of photovoltaics affects the environment. If they are located where photosynthesizing plants would normally grow, they simply substitute one potentially renewable resource (biomass) for another. It should be noted, however, that the biomass cycle converts solar radiation energy to chemical energy ( with significantly less efficiency than photovoltaic cells alone). And if they are placed on the sides of buildings (such as in Manchester) or fences, or rooftops (as long as plants would not normally be placed there), or in the desert they are purely additive to the renewable power base.[citations needed]

[edit] Greenhouse gases

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions are now in the range of 25-32 g/kWh and this could decrease to 15 g/kWh in the future.[81] For comparison, a combined cycle gas-fired power plant emits some 400 g/kWh and a coal-fired power plant 915 g/kWh and with carbon capture and storage some 200 g/kWh. Only nuclear power and wind are better, emitting 6-25 g/kWh and 11 g/kWh on average. Using renewable energy sources in manufacturing and transportation would further drop carbon emissions.

[edit] Cadmium

One issue that has often raised concerns is the use of cadmium in cadmium telluride solar cells (CdTe is only used in a few types of PV panels). Cadmium in its metallic form is a toxic substance that has the tendency to accumulate in ecological food chains. The amount of cadmium used in thin-film PV modules is relatively small (5-10 g/m²) and with proper emission control techniques in place the cadmium emissions from module production can be almost zero. Current PV technologies lead to cadmium emissions of 0.3-0.9 microgram/kWh over the whole life-cycle.[81] Most of these emissions actually arise through the use of coal power for the manufacturing of the modules, and coal and lignite combustion leads to much higher emissions of cadmium. Life-cycle cadmium emissions from coal is 3.1 microgram/kWh, lignite 6.2, and natural gas 0.2 microgram/kWh.

Note that if electricity produced by photovoltaic panels were used to manufacture the modules instead of electricity from burning coal, cadmium emissions from coal power usage in the manufacturing process could be entirely eliminated.

[edit] Energy payback time and energy returned on energy invested

The energy payback time is the time required to produce an amount of energy as great as what was consumed during production. The energy payback time is determined from a life cycle analysis of energy.

Another key indicator of environmental performance, tightly related to the energy payback time, is the ratio of electricity generated divided by the energy required to build and maintain the equipment. This ratio is called the energy returned on energy invested (EROEI). Of course, little is gained if it takes as much energy to produce the modules as they produce in their lifetimes. This should not be confused with the economic return on investment, which varies according to local energy prices, subsidies available and metering techniques.

Life-cycle analyses show that the energy intensity of typical solar photovoltaic technologies is rapidly evolving. In 2000 the energy payback time was estimated as 8 to 11 years[82], but more recent studies suggest that technological progress has reduced this to 1.5 to 3.5 years for crystalline silicon PV systems [81].

Thin film technologies now have energy pay-back times in the range of 1-1.5 years (S.Europe).[81] With lifetimes of such systems of at least 30 years, the EROEI is in the range of 10 to 30. They thus generate enough energy over their lifetimes to reproduce themselves many times (6-31 reproductions, the EROEI is a bit lower) depending on what type of material, balance of system (or BOS), and the geographic location of the system.[83]

[edit] Advantages

  • The 89 petawatts of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface is plentiful - almost 6,000 times more than the 15 terawatts of average power consumed by humans.[84] Additionally, solar electric generation has the highest power density (global mean of 170 W/m²) among renewable energies.[84]
  • Solar power is pollution free during use. Production end wastes and emissions are manageable using existing pollution controls. End-of-use recycling technologies are under development.[85]
  • Facilities can operate with little maintenance or intervention after initial setup.
  • Solar electric generation is economically superior where grid connection or fuel transport is difficult, costly or impossible. Examples include satellites, island communities, remote locations and ocean vessels.
  • When grid-connected, solar electric generation can displace the highest cost electricity during times of peak demand (in most climatic regions), can reduce grid loading, and can eliminate the need for local battery power for use in times of darkness and high local demand; such application is enabled by net metering. Time-of-use net metering can be highly favorable, but is impractical to implement for small photovoltaic systems.
  • Grid-connected solar electricity can be used locally thus reducing transmission/distribution losses (transmission losses were approximately 7.2% in 1995).[86]
  • Once the initial capital cost of building a solar power plant has been spent, operating costs are extremely low compared to existing power technologies.
  • Compared to fossil and nuclear energy sources, very little research-money has been invested in the development of solar cells, so there is much room for improvement. Nevertheless, experimental high efficiency solar cells already have efficiencies of over 40% and efficiencies are rapidly rising while mass production costs are rapidly falling.[87]

[edit] Disadvantages

  • A major drawback is the sheer volume of land required to house a solar power generation plant. The 550MW California plant that is planned required 9.5 square miles. Many areas of the country could not find this amount of unused land or assemble the large number of parcels required for this type of project. At the same time, photovoltaics take up no land at all when installed on existing rooftops or on land not otherwise used, such as decommissioned coal pits or in deserts.
  • Depending on the cost of the installation and local electric rates the payback can be 14–20 years. While the modules are warranted for 20 years, the investment is mostly lost if you move. The city of Berkeley has come up with an innovative financing method to remove this limitation, by adding a tax assessment that is transferred with the home to pay for the solar panels.[88]
  • Solar electricity is more expensive based on current rates. Once a PV system is installed it will produce electricity for the same cost until the inverter needs replacing (about 12 years). Current utility rates have increased every year for the past 20 years and with the increasing pressure on carbon reduction the rate will increase more aggressively. This increase will (in the long run) easily offset the increased cost at installation but the timetable for payback is too long for most.
  • Solar electricity is not available at night and is less available in cloudy weather conditions from conventional silicon based technologies. Therefore, a storage or complementary power system is required. However, the use of germanium in amorphous silicon-germanium thin film solar cells provides residual power generating capacity at night due to background infrared radiation. Fortunately, most power consumption is during the day, so solar does not need to be stored at all as long as it offsets peak and "shoulder" consumption.
  • Limited power density: Average daily insolation in the contiguous U.S. is 3-7 Gigawatt·h/km²[clarification needed][89][90][91] and on average lower in Europe.
  • Solar cells produce DC which must be converted to AC (using a grid tie inverter) when used in currently existing distribution grids. This incurs an energy loss of 4-12%.[92]

[edit] Photovoltaics companies

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c German PV market
  2. ^ BP Solar to Expand Its Solar Cell Plants in Spain and India
  3. ^ Large-Scale, Cheap Solar Electricity
  4. ^ Solar Expected to Maintain its Status as the World's Fastest-Growing Energy Technology
  5. ^ a b Global Solar Photovoltaic Market Analysis and Forecasts to 2020
  6. ^ GE Invests, Delivers One of World's Largest Solar Power Plants
  7. ^ Building integrated photovoltaics
  8. ^ Approved — Feed-in tariff in Israel.
  9. ^ In India’s Sea of Darkness: An Unsustainable Island of Decentralized Energy Production
  10. ^ Solar Generation V - 2008
  11. ^ A Better Way to Make Solar Power
  12. ^ Company Information Overview
  13. ^ The technology at a glance
  14. ^ Converting sunlight to electricity
  15. ^ Solar Photovoltaic Panels
  16. ^ MMA Renewable Ventures Solar Energy Program
  17. ^ U.S. Retailers Save with Solar PV & Energy Efficiency
  18. ^ Solar Power Services: How PPAs are Changing the PV Value Chain
  19. ^ Berkeley FIRST retrieved 8 February 2008
  20. ^ SunPower Announces $330 Million Global Solar Supply Agreement With PowerLight
  21. ^ UD-led team sets solar cell record, joins DuPont on $100 million project retrieved 8 October 2008
  22. ^ MarketBuzz 2008: Annual World Solar Photovoltaic Industry Report
  23. ^ World PV Industry Report Summary March 16, 2009 retrieved 28 March 2009
  24. ^ Geoff Nairn (2007-08-01 Wed 18:14 CEST). "Shiny prospects for solar equipment makers". EngagingChina. Retrieved on 2008-02-14. 
  25. ^ Antonio Luque and Steven Hegedus (2003). Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 0471491969. 
  26. ^ The PVWatts Solar Calculator
  27. ^ UtiliPoint International, Inc. 'Issue alert - What is a megawatt?
  28. ^ Total electric power consumption
  29. ^ Dr. Wissing, Lothar; Jülich, Forschungszentrum & Jülich, Projektträger (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Germany 2006 - Version 2" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Germany. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  30. ^ a b Sherwood, Larry; Les Nelson, Fred Morse, Jeff Wolfe, Chris O’Brien (2006). "US Solar Industry - Year In Review - 2006" (PDF). Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) & The Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  31. ^ Ikki, Osamu; Matsubara, Koji (2007-05-25). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Japan 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Japan. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  32. ^ Pedigo, Susannah; Maycock, Paul D. & Bower, Ward (2007-08-30). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in The United States Of America 2006 - Version 14" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for The USA. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  33. ^ Guastella, Salvatore; Castello, Salvatore & Anna De Lillo (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Italy 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Italy. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  34. ^ Watt, Muriel (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Australia 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Australia. Retrieved on 2007-10-16. 
  35. ^ Blakers, Andrew W. (2000). "Solar and Wind Electricity in Australia" (pdf). Australian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 7, pp 223-236, 2000. Retrieved on 2008-09-03. 
  36. ^ Yoon, Kyung-Hoon; Kim, Donghwan & Yoon, Kyung Shick (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Korea 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for The Republic of Korea. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  37. ^ Claverie, André; Equer, Bernard (2007-07-15). "Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Applications in France National Survey Report 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for France. Retrieved on 2008-03-13. 
  38. ^ Swens, Job (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in The Netherlands 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for The Netherlands. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  39. ^ Hüsser, Pius; Hostettler, Thomas (May 2007). "National Survey Report on PV Power Applications in Switzerland 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Switzerland. Retrieved on 2007-12-11. 
  40. ^ Ayoub, Josef; Martel, Sylvain & Dr. Dignard-Bailey, Lisa (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Canada 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Canada. Retrieved on 2007-10-16. 
  41. ^ Davidson, Sarah (2007-October). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in the United Kingdom 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for The United Kingdom. Retrieved on 2008-03-16. 
  42. ^ a b EurObserv'ER, (Includes Some Discredited/Preliminary Sources) (2007-April). "EurObserv’ER - Photovoltaic Energy Barometer" (PDF). Systèmes Solaires - Le Journal des Énergies Renouvelables n° 178: pp. 49–70. Retrieved on 2007-09-07. 
  43. ^ Bugge, Lars; Salvesen, Fritjof (2007-05-30). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Norway 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Norway. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  44. ^ Malm, Ulf; Stolt, Lars (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Sweden 2006" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Sweden. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  45. ^ Ahm, Peter (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Denmark 2006 - Version 04" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Denmark. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  46. ^ Dr. Siderer, Yona; Dann, Roxana (May 2007). "National Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Israel 2006 - Version 14" (PDF). IEA - PVPS Programme - NSRs for Israel. Retrieved on 2007-10-20. 
  47. ^ FRB: G.5A Release-- Foreign Exchange Rates, Release Dates
  48. ^ EurObserv'ER, (Includes Some Discredited/Preliminary Sources) (2007-April). "EurObserv’ER - Photovoltaic Energy Barometer" (ASP). Systèmes Solaires - Le Journal des Énergies Renouvelables n° 178: pp. 49–70. Retrieved on 2007-09-07. 
  49. ^ a b Greenpeace Energy (2008). World's largest photovoltaic power plants
  50. ^ Nellis activates Nations largest PV Array
  51. ^ Largest U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Begins Construction at Nellis Air Force Base
  52. ^ Citysolar (2007). Solar park of the superlative
  53. ^ "GE, SunPower, Catavento team on plant". BusinessWeek. 2007-03-28. Retrieved on 2007-03-29. 
  54. ^ Strickland, Tonya (2008-04-24). "$1 billion-plus Carrisa Plains solar farm could power 190,000 firms". The San Luis Obispo Tribune. Retrieved on 2008-08-19. 
  55. ^ a b Sneed, David (2008-08-14). "Calif. utility agrees to buy solar power from two proposed plants". The San Luis Obispo Tribune. Retrieved on 2008-08-15. 
  56. ^ a b "PG&E Signs Historic 800 MW Photovoltaic Solar Power Agreements With Optisolar and Sunpower". Pacific Gas & Electric. 2008-08-14. Retrieved on 2008-08-15. 
  57. ^ Building Integrated Photovoltaics, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, accessed: 2007-03-23.
  58. ^ Terrasolar, accessed: 2007-03-23.
  59. ^ SolidWorks Plays Key Role in Cambridge Eco Race Effort retrieved 8 February 2009
  60. ^ Parkeon parking meters
  61. ^ Security Products, December 2006, p42
  62. ^ Solar loans light up rural India
  63. ^ Off grid solutions for remote poor
  64. ^ Rural Cuba Basks in the Sun
  65. ^ Solar Roads attract funding
  66. ^ Solar ABC
  67. ^ Solar Energy Technologies Program pp. 52, 53 retrieved 28 March 2009
  68. ^ EERE's Consumer Guide: Siting Your Small Solar Electric System
  69. ^ Reflective mirrors seen raising solar potential, Ari Rabinovitch, Reuters, August 10, 2007 retrieved 8 February 2009
  70. ^ Zenith Solar’s Light of a Thousand Suns, Green Prophet, December 17, 2007.
  71. ^ At the Zenith of Solar Energy, Neal Sandler,BusinessWeek, March 26, 2008.
  72. ^ Going for grid parity2005 article
  73. ^ Gaining on the grid
  74. ^ The Path to Grid Parity (Graphic)
  75. ^ Abengoa Solar retrieved 22 October 2008
  76. ^
  77. ^ a b The True Cost of Solar Power retrieved 22 October 2008
  78. ^ Solar Rebate Program
  79. ^
  80. ^ a b c d Alsema, E.A.; Wild - Scholten, M.J. de; Fthenakis, V.M. Environmental impacts of PV electricity generation - a critical comparison of energy supply options ECN, September 2006; 7p. Presented at the 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Dresden, Germany, 4-8 September 2006.
  81. ^ Andrew Blakers and Klaus Weber, “The Energy Intensity of Photovoltaic Systems”, Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Australian National University, 2000.
  82. ^ Joshua Pearce and Andrew Lau, “Net Energy Analysis For Sustainable Energy Production From Silicon Based Solar Cells”, Proceedings of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Solar 2002: Sunrise on the Reliable Energy Economy, editor R. Campbell-Howe, 2002.
  83. ^ a b Vaclav Smil - Energy at the Crossroads
  84. ^ Environmental Aspects of PV Power Systems
  85. ^ U.S. Climate Change Technology Program - Transmission and Distribution Technologies
  86. ^
  87. ^ Berkeley FIRST retrieved 4 February 2009
  88. ^[dead link]NREL Map of Flat Plate Collector at Latitude Tilt Yearly Average Solar Radiation
  89. ^ Solar Energy Technologies Program: Solar FAQs US Department of Energy. Retrieved on 24 August 2007,
  90. ^ Solar panel achieves high efficiency
  91. ^ Renewable Resource Data Center - PV Correction Factors


  • H. Hovel, "Semiconductors & Semimetals, Volume II, Solar Cells," Academic Press, N. Y., 1975;
  • Bachmann et al., "Preparation of P-Type InP -- Vapor Deposition."J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 123, No. 10, Oct. 1976, pp. 1509–1513;
  • Fraas et al., "InP Epitaxial Thin-Film -- Reactive Deposition", Applied Physics Letters, vol. 28, No. 8, Apr. 15 1976, pp. 415–417;
  • K. J. Bachmann et al., "Polycrystalline Thin-Film InP-CdS Solar Cells", Appl. Phys. Letters, vol. 29, No. 2, July 1976, pp. 121–123.

United States Patents;

  • T102,801 Silicon solar cell;
  • 4,329,534 Uniform incident light high voltage solar cell array;
  • 4,292,461 Amorphous-crystalline tandem solar cell;
  • 4,289,920 Multiple bandgap solar cell on transparent substrate;
  • 4,276,137 Control of surface recombination loss in solar cells;
  • 4,202,704 Optical energy conversion;
  • 4,178,195 Semiconductor structure;
  • 4,122,476 Semiconductor heterostructure

[edit] External links

Photovoltaic industry associations
Photovoltaics research institutes

There are many research institutions and departments at universities around the world who are active in photovoltaics research. Countries which are particularly active include Germany, Spain, Japan, Australia, China, and the USA.

Some universities and institutes which have a photovoltaics research department


North America


Publicly funded free data sources
Live data
Personal tools