Celeron
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
|
| Produced | From April 1998 to Present |
|---|---|
| Common manufacturer(s) | Intel |
| Max. CPU clock | 266 MHz to 3.6 GHz |
| FSB speeds | 66 MHz to 800 MT/s |
| Min. feature size | 0.25µm to 65nm |
| Instruction set | x86, x86-64 |
| Microarchitecture | P6, NetBurst, Core |
| Socket(s) | Slot 1 Socket M |
| Core name(s) | Covington Mendocino |
The Celeron brand is a range of x86 CPUs from Intel targeted at budget/value personal computers—with the motto, "delivering great quality at an exceptional value".
Celeron processors can run all IA-32 computer programs, but their performance is somewhat lower when compared to similar, but higher priced, Intel CPU brands. For example, the Celeron brand will often have less cache memory, or have advanced features purposely disabled. These missing features have had a variable impact on performance. In some cases, the effect was significant and in other cases the differences were relatively minor. Many of the Celeron designs have achieved a very high "bang to the buck", while at other times, the performance difference has been noticeable. For example, some intense application software, such as cutting edge PC games, programs for video compression, video editing, or solid modeling (CAD, engineering analysis, computer graphics and animation, rapid prototyping, medical testing, product visualization, and visualization of scientific research), etc.[1] may not perform as well on the Celeron family. This has been the primary justification for the higher cost of other Intel CPU brands versus the Celeron.
Introduced in April 1998,[2] the first Celeron branded CPU was based on the Pentium II branded core. Subsequent Celeron branded CPUs were based on the Pentium III, Pentium 4, Pentium M, and Core 2 Duo branded processors. The latest Celeron design (as of January 2008) is based on the Core 2 Duo (Allendale). This design features independent processing cores (CPUs), but with only 25% as much cache memory as the comparable Core 2 Duo offering.
Contents |
[edit] Background
As a product concept, the Celeron was introduced in response to Intel's loss of the low-end market, in particular to Cyrix's 6x86, AMD's K6, and IDT Winchip. Intel's existing low-end product, the Pentium MMX, was no longer performance competitive at 233 MHz.[3] Although a faster Pentium MMX would have been a lower-risk strategy, the industry standard Socket 7 platform hosted a market of competitor CPUs which could be drop-in replacements for the Pentium MMX. Instead, Intel pursued a budget part that was pin-compatible with their high-end Pentium II product, using the Pentium II's (Slot 1) interface. The Celeron was used in many low end machines and, in some ways, became the standard for non gaming computers.
| Intel Celeron processor family | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Logo | New Logo | Desktop | Laptop | ||||
| Code-named | Core | Date released | Code-named | Core | Date released | ||
 |
 |
Covington Mendocino Coppermine Tualatin Willamette Northwood Conroe-L |
(250nm) (250nm) (180nm) (130nm) (180nm) (130nm) (65nm) |
Apr 1998 Aug 1998 Mar 2000 Oct 2001 May 2002 Sep 2002 Jun 2007 |
Mendocino Coppermine Tualatin Northwood Yonah-512 Merom |
(250nm) (180nm) (130nm) (130nm) (65nm) (65nm) |
Jan 1999 Feb 2000 Apr 2002 Jun 2002 Apr 2006 Jan 2007 |
 |
 |
Banias Dothan Yonah Merom |
(130nm) (90nm) (65nm) (65nm) |
Jan 2004 Aug 2004 Apr 2006 Jan 2007 |
|||
 |
 |
Prescott Cedar Mill |
(90nm) (65nm) |
Jun 2004 May 2006 |
|||
 |
Allendale | dual (65nm) | Jan 2008 | Merom | dual (65nm) | Jul 2008 | |
| List of Intel Celeron microprocessors | |||||||
[edit] Celeron (P6)
[edit] Covington
The first Covington Celeron was essentially a 266 MHz Deschutes Pentium II manufactured without any secondary cache at all.[4] Covington also shared the 80523 product code of Deschutes. Although clocked at 266 or 300 MHz (frequencies 33 or 66 MHz higher than the desktop version of the Pentium w/MMX), the cacheless Celerons were a good deal slower than the parts they were designed to replace.[3] Substantial numbers were sold on first release, largely on the strength of the Intel name, but the Celeron quickly achieved a poor reputation both in the trade press and among computer professionals.[5] The initial market interest faded rapidly in the face of its poor performance and with sales at a very low level, Intel felt obliged to develop a substantially faster replacement as soon as possible. Nevertheless the first Celerons were quite popular among some overclockers, for their flexible overclockability and reasonable price.[3] Covington was only manufactured in slot 1 SEPP format.
[edit] Mendocino
The Mendocino Celeron, launched 24 August 1998, was the first retail CPU to use on-die L2 cache. Whereas Covington had no secondary cache at all, Mendocino included 128 KB of L2 cache running at full clock rate. The first Mendocino-core Celeron was clocked at a then-modest 300 MHz but offered almost twice the performance of the old cacheless Covington Celeron at the same clock rate. To distinguish it from the older Covington 300 MHz, Intel called the Mendocino core Celeron 300A.[6] Although the other Mendocino Celerons (the 333 MHz part, for example) did not have an "A" appended, some people call all Mendocino processors "Celeron-A" regardless of clock rate.
The new Mendocino core Celeron was a good performer from the outset. Indeed, most industry analysts regarded the first Mendocino-based Celerons as too successful—performance was sufficiently high to not only compete strongly with rival parts, but also to attract buyers away from Intel's high-profit flagship, the Pentium II. Overclockers soon discovered that, given a high-end motherboard, the Celeron 300A could run reliably at 450 MHz. This was achieved by simply increasing the Front Side Bus (FSB) clock rate from the stock 66 MHz to the 100 MHz clock of the Pentium II. At this frequency, the Mendocino Celeron rivaled the fastest x86 processors available.[6]
At the time on-die cache was difficult to manufacture; especially L2 as more of it is needed to attain an adequate level of performance. A benefit of on-die cache is that it operates at the same clock rate as the CPU. All other Intel CPUs at that time used motherboard mounted or slot mounted secondary L2 cache, which was very easy to manufacture, cheap, and simple to enlarge to any desired size (typical cache sizes were 512 KB or 1 MB), but they carried the performance penalty of slower cache performance, typically running the FSB at a frequency of 60 to 100 MHz for motherboard mounted L2 cache. The implementation of the Pentium II's 512 KB of L2 cache was unique at the time, comprising moderately high-performance L2 cache chips mounted on a special-purpose board alongside the processor itself, running at half the processor's performance and communicating with the CPU through a special backside bus. This method of cache placement was expensive and imposed practical cache-size limits, but allowed the Pentium II to be clocked higher and avoided front side bus RAM/L2 cache contention typical with motherboard-placed L2 cache configurations.[7]
Over time, newer Mendocino processors were released at 333, 366, 400, 433, 466, 500, and 533 MHz. The "Mendocino" Celeron CPU came only designed for a 66 MHz frontside bus, but this would not be a serious performance bottleneck until clock rates reached higher levels.
The Mendocino Celerons also introduced new packaging. When the Mendocinos debuted they came in both a Slot 1 SEPP and Socket 370 PPGA package. The Slot 1 form had been designed to accommodate the off-chip cache of the Pentium II and had mounting problems with motherboards. Because all Celerons are a single-chip design, however, there was no reason to retain the slot packaging for L2 cache storage, and Intel discontinued the Slot 1 variant: beginning with the 466 MHz part, only the PPGA Socket 370 form was offered. (Third-party manufacturers made motherboard slot-to-socket adapters (nicknamed Slotkets) available for a few dollars, which allowed, for example, a Celeron 500 to be fitted to a Slot 1 motherboard.) One interesting note about the PPGA Socket 370 Mendocinos is they supported symmetric multiprocessing (SMP), and there was at least one motherboard released (the ABIT BP6) which took advantage of this fact.
The Mendocino also came in a mobile variant, with clock rates from 266, 300, 333, 366, 400, 433, 466, 500, 533, and 600 MHZ.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Mendocino CPUs are family 6, model 6 and their Intel product code is 80524. These identifiers are shared with the related Dixon Mobile Pentium II variant.
[edit] Coppermine-128
|
|
The next generation Celeron was the Coppermine-128 (sometimes known as the "Celeron II"). These were a derivative of Intel's Coppermine Pentium III and were released on March 29, 2000.[8] Like the Mendocino, the Celeron-128 used 128 KB of on-chip L2 cache and was (initially) restricted to a 66 MHz Front Side Bus Speed, But the big news was the addition of SSE instructions, due to the new Coppermine core. Other than half the L2 cache (128 KB instead of 256 KB) and a lower FSB (66 to 100 MHz instead of 100 to 133 MHz), the Coppermine Celeron was identical to the Coppermine Pentium III.
All Coppermine-128s were produced in the same FCPGA Socket 370 format that most Coppermine Pentium III CPUs used. These Celeron processors began at 533 MHz and continued through 566, 600, 633, 666, 700, 733, and 766 MHz. Because of the limitations of the 66 MHz bus, there were diminishing returns on performance as clock rates increased. On January 3, 2001, Intel switched to a 100 MHz bus with the launch of the 800 MHz Celeron, resulting in a significant performance-per-clock improvement.[9] All Celeron-128 CPUs from 800 MHz and higher use the 100 MHz front side bus. Various models were made at 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, and 1100 MHz.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Coppermine Celerons and Pentium IIIs are family 6, model 8 and their Intel product code is 80526.
[edit] Tualatin-256
These Celeron processors, released initially at 1200 MHz (1.2 GHz) on October 2, 2001,[10] were based on Pentium III Tualatin core and made with a 0.13 micrometer process for the FCPGA2 socket 370 . They were nicknamed "Tualeron" — a portmanteau of the words Tualatin and Celeron. Some software and users refer to the chips as "Celeron-S", referring to the chip's lineage with the Pentium III-S, but this is not an official designation. Intel later released 1000 MHz and 1100 MHz parts (which were given the extension "A" to their name to differentiate them from the Coppermine-128 of the same clock rate they replaced).[11] A 1,300 MHz chip, launched January 4, 2002,[12] and finally a 1,400 MHz chip, launched May 15, 2002 (the same day as the Netburst Willamette 1.7 GHz Celeron launch),[13] marked the end of the Tualatin-256 line.
With regards to core functionality, Tualatin-256 was again quite similar to its Pentium III sibling. The most significant differences were a lower 100 MHz bus and only 256 KB of L2 cache (whereas the Pentium III had either 256 KB or 512 KB of L2 cache). Furthermore, the Tualeron's L2 cache had a higher latency which boosted manufacturing yields for this budget CPU.
Despite offering much improved performance over the Coppermine Celeron it superseded, the Tualatin Celeron still suffered stiff competition from AMD's Duron budget processor.[14] Intel later responded by releasing the Netburst Willamette Celeron, and for some time Tualatin Celerons were manufactured and sold in parallel with their replacement Pentium 4-based Celerons.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Tualatin Celerons and Pentium IIIs are family 6, model 11 and their Intel product code is 80530.
[edit] Celeron (NetBurst)
[edit] Willamette-128
These Celerons were for socket 478 and were based on the Willamette Pentium 4 core, being a completely different design compared to the previous Tualatin Celeron. These are often known as the "Celeron 4". Their L2 cache (128 KB) is half that of the Pentium 4 Willamette's 256 KB of L2 cache, but otherwise the two are very similar. With the transition to the Pentium 4 core the Celeron now featured SSE2 instructions. The ability to share the same socket as the Pentium 4 meant that the Celeron now had the option to use RDRAM, DDR SDRAM, or traditional SDRAM. Willamette Celerons were launched May 15, 2002, initially at 1.7 GHz, and offered a noticeable performance improvement over the older Tualatin Celeron 1.3 GHz part, being able to finally beat the Duron 1.3 GHz, which at the time was AMD's top competing budget processor.[15] On June 12, 2002, Intel launched the last Willamette Celeron, a 1.8 GHz model.[16]
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Willamette Celerons and Pentium 4s are family 15, model 1, and their Intel product code is 80531.
[edit] Northwood-128
These socket 478 Celerons are based on the Northwood Pentium 4 core, and also have 128 KB of L2 cache. The only difference between the Northwood-128 and the Willamette-128 Celeron is the fact that it was built on the new 0.13 micrometre process which shrunk the die size, increased the transistor count, and lowered the core voltage from 1.7 V on the Willamette-128 to 1.52 V for the Northwood-128. Despite these differences, they are functionally the same as the Willamette-128 Celeron, and perform largely the same clock-for-clock. The Northwood-128 family of processors were initially released as a 2.0 GHz Model (a 1.9 GHz model was announced earlier, but never launched[17]) on September 18, 2002.[18] Since that time Intel has released at total of 10 different clock rates ranging from 1.8 GHz to 2.8 GHz, before being surpassed by the Celeron D. Although the Northwood Celerons suffer considerably from their small L2 cache, some clock rates have been favored in the enthusiast market, because like the old 300A, they can run well above their specified clock rate.[19]
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Northwood Celerons and Pentium 4s are family 15, model 2, and their Intel product code is 80532.
[edit] Celeron D
[edit] Prescott-256
Prescott-256 Celeron D processors, initially launched June 25, 2004,[20] feature double the L1 cache (16 KB) and L2 cache (256 KB) as compared to the previous Willamette and Northwood desktop Celerons, by virtue of being based on the Prescott Pentium 4 core.[21] It also features a 533 MT/s bus and SSE3, and a 3xx model number (compared to 5xx for Pentium 4s and 7xx for Pentium Ms). The Prescott-256 Celeron D was manufactured for socket 478 as well LGA775, and they were released carrying model numbers of 355 (3.33 GHz), 350 (3.2 GHz), 345 (3.06 GHz) 340 (2.93 GHz), 335 (2.80 GHz), 330 (2.66 GHz), 325 (2.53 GHz), 320 (2.40 GHz), 315 (2.26 GHz), and 310 (2.13 GHz). They also have hardware-level support of Intel's Intel 64 technology by virtue of it also being built into the Prescott core, although the feature is disabled in all 3x0/3x5 models (with the exception of the Celeron D model 355). It has been activated in all 3x1 and 3x6 models. The Intel Celeron D processor works with the Intel 845 and 865 chipset families. It should be noted that the "D" suffix actually has no official designation. It is used simply to distinguish this line of Celeron from the previous, lower performing Northwood and Willamette series, and also from the mobile series, the Celeron M (which also uses 3xx model numbers).[22] It should also be stated that unlike the Pentium D, the Celeron D is not a dual core processor.
The Celeron D was a major performance improvement over previous Netburst Celerons. A test using a variety of applications, run by Derek Wilson at Anandtech.com, showed that the new Celeron D architecture alone offered up performance improvements on average of >10% over a Northwood Celeron when both CPUs were run at the same bus and clock rate.[23] The addition of SSE 3 instructions and the higher FSB only added to this already impressive gain.
Despite its many improvements, the Prescott core of the Celeron D had at least one major drawback: heat. Unlike the fairly cool running Northwood Celeron, the Prescott-256 had a class-rated TDP of 73 watts, which prompted Intel to include a more intricate copper core/aluminum finned cooler to help handle the additional heat.[24]
In mid-2005, Intel refreshed the Celeron D with Intel 64 and XD Bit (eXecute Disable) enabled. Model numbers increase by 1 over the previous generation (e.g. 330 became 331). This only applied to LGA775 Celeron Ds. There are no Socket 478 CPUs with 64-bit or XD Bit capabilities.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Prescott Celeron Ds and Pentium 4s are family 15, model 3 (up to stepping E0) or 4 (stepping E0 onwards), and their Intel product code is 80546 or 80547, depending on socket type.
[edit] Cedar Mill-512
Based on the Cedar Mill Pentium 4 core, this version of the Celeron D was launched May 28, 2006,and continued the 3xx naming scheme with the Celeron D 347 (3.06 GHz), 352 (3.2 GHz), 356 (3.33 GHz), 360 (3.46 GHz), and 365 (3.6GHz). The Cedar Mill Celeron D is largely the same as the Prescott-256, except with double the L2 cache (512KB) and based on a 65nm manufacturing process. The Cedar Mill-512 Celeron D is LGA775 exclusive. The main benefits of the Cedar Mill Celerons over the Prescott Celerons are the slightly increased performance due to the larger L2 cache, higher clock rates, and less heat dissipation, with several models having a TDP lowered to 65 watts from Prescott's lowest offering of 73W.[25]
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Cedar Mill Celeron Ds and Pentium 4s are family 15, model 6, and their Intel product code is 80552.
[edit] Celeron (Core)
[edit] Conroe-L
The Conroe-L Celeron is a single-core processor built on the Intel Core microarchitecture and is thus clocked much lower than the Cedar Mill Celerons, but still outperforms them. It is based on the 65 nm Conroe-L core,[26] and uses a 400-series model number sequence.[27] The FSB was increased to 800 MHz from 533 MHz in this generation, and the TDP was decreased from 65W to 35W. As is traditional with Celerons, it does not have Intel VT-x instruction support or SpeedStep (although Enhanced Halt State is enabled, allowing the Celerons to lower the multiplier to 6x and decrease core voltage while idle). All Conroe-L models are single-core processors for the value segment of the market, much like the AMD K8-based Sempron. The product line was launched on June 5, 2007.[28]
On October 21, 2007, Intel presented a new processor for its Intel Essential Series. The full name of the processor is Celeron 220 and is soldered on the D201GLY2 motherboard. With 1.2 GHz and a 512KB second level cache it has a TDP of 19 Watt and can be cooled passively. The Celeron 220 is the successor of the Celeron 215 which is based on a Yonah core and used on the D201GLY motherboard. This processor is exclusively used on the mini-ITX boards targeted to the sub-value market segment.
| Model | Clock rate | FSB freq. | L2 cache |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celeron 220 | 1.2 GHz | 133 MHz QDR | 512 KB |
| Celeron 420 | 1.6 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512 KB |
| Celeron 430 | 1.8 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512 KB |
| Celeron 440 | 2.0 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512 KB |
| Celeron 450 | 2.2 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512 KB |
[edit] Celeron Dual-Core (Core)
[edit] Allendale-512
Intel launched the new dual core Celeron E1200 processor on January 20, 2008, based on the Allendale-512 core. The CPU has 512KB L2 cache, 800MT/s FSB, 1.6 GHz clock rate and 65W TDP. New features to the Celeron family included full enhanced halt state and enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology. Several future models are planned, up to the 2.4 GHz E1600. The new Celerons will run in any motherboard that supports current Core 2 Duo family processors.[29]
| Model | Clock rate | FSB freq. | L2 cache | Release date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celeron E1200 | 1.6 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512KB | January 20, 2008 |
| Celeron E1400 | 2.0 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512KB | April 20, 2008 |
| Celeron E1500 | 2.2 GHz | 200 MHz QDR | 512KB | November 30, 2008 |
[edit] Mobile Celeron and Celeron M
[edit] Mendocino Mobile
Similar to the Mendocino ("Celeron-A"): 0.25μm, 32 KB L1-Cache and 128 KB L2-Cache, but uses a lower voltage (1.5-1.9V) and two power-saving modes - Quick Start and Deep Sleep. Packaged in the small, 615-pin BGA2 or Micro-PGA2 package.
[edit] Tualatin-256
These were the first Mobile Celerons, based on the Tualatin core. These differed from their desktop counterparts in that the Mobile series were offered in both 100 MHz and 133 MHz FSB. Like the desktop Tualatins, these chips had 256KB of L2 cache.
[edit] Northwood-256
These are the Mobile Celeron range used in laptops. Also based on the Northwood core, they feature a 256 KB L2 Cache. These Celeron processors were a good deal higher performing than the desktop counterparts because of their larger L2 cache sizes.[30] They were eventually replaced by the Celeron M brand which is built around the Pentium M processor design.
[edit] Banias-512
This Celeron (sold under the Celeron M brand) is based on the Banias Pentium M, and differs from its parent in that it has half the L2 cache, and does not support the clock-varying SpeedStep technology. It performs reasonably well compared to the Pentium M, but battery life is noticeably shorter on a Celeron M–based notebook than it is on a comparable Pentium M notebook.
A system based on the Celeron M processor may not use the Centrino brand name, regardless of what chipset and Wi-Fi components are used.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Banias Celeron Ms and Pentium Ms are family 6, model 9 and their Intel product code is 80535.
[edit] Shelton
The Shelton core is a Banias core without any L2 cache and SpeedStep. It is used in Intel's small form factor D845GVSH motherboard, intended for Asian and South American markets. The processor identifies itself as a "Intel Celeron 1.0B GHz", to differentiate it from the previous Coppermine-128 and "Tualeron" 1.0 GHz processors.
The "Shelton'08" is a basic platform for a low cost notebook released by Intel at January 2008. The platform uses Intel's single-core Diamondville CPU with a clock frequency of 1.6 GHz and a 533 MHz FSB and power consumption of 3.5W. Its total power consumption is around 8W, translating to battery usage time of between 3-4 hours. The platform consists of a 945GSE chipset, which includes built-in DirectX 9 graphics and supports single channel DDR2 memory. A 802.11g Wi-Fi module, USB/PATA port SSD (solid state drive), and a 7- or 8-inch panel will typically round out the platform.
[edit] Dothan-1024
A 90 nm Celeron M with half of the L2 cache of the 90 nm Dothan Pentium Ms (twice the L2 cache of the 130nm Celeron Ms, though), and, like its predecessor, lacking SpeedStep. The first Celeron Ms that supports the XD bit was released in January 2005, in general any Celeron M released after that supports the XD bit. There is also a 512 KB low voltage version which is used in the ASUS Eee PC.
In Intel's "Family/Model/Stepping" scheme, Dothan Celeron Ms and Pentium Ms are family 6, model 13 and their Intel product code is 80536.
[edit] Yonah-1024
The Celeron M 400-series is a 65 nm Celeron M based on the single-core Yonah Core Solo CPU. Like its predecessors in the Celeron M series, this Celeron M has half of the L2 cache (1 MB) of Core Solo and lacks SpeedStep. This core also brings new features to Celeron M including a higher front side bus (533 MT/s), SSE3 instructions. September 2006 and January 4, 2008 mark a discontinuation of many Celeron M branded CPUs.[31]
[edit] Merom-1024
The Celeron M 520 (1.6 GHz), 530 (1.73 GHz), 540 (1.86 GHz), 550 (2.0 GHz), and 560 (2.13 GHz) are single-core 65 nm CPUs based on the Merom Core 2 architecture. They feature a 533 MHz FSB, 1 MB of L2 cache (half that of the low end Core 2 Duo's 2 MB cache), XD-bit support, and Intel 64 technology, but lack SpeedStep and Virtualization Technology. January 4, 2008 marked the discontinuation of Merom-1024 CPUs.[31]
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Schmid, Patrick (2002-10-16). "The New Generation Is Here: Celeron 2.0 GHz, with 0.13 µm". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/2002/10/16/the_new_generation_is_here/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Walker, Seth (1998-08-24). "New Intel Pentium II and Celeron Processors Complete 1998 Desktop Processor Line-up". Business Wire. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1998_August_24/ai_21215682. Retrieved on 2007-07-17.
- ^ a b c Pabst, Thomas (1998-04-16). "CPU Performance from Socket 7 to Slot 1". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/1998/04/16/cpu_performance_from_socket_7_to_slot_1/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Slater, Michael (1998-05-27). "Microprocessors have PCs humming". EE Times. http://www.eetimes.com/myf98/ao_slater.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Zisman, Alex (June 1998). "Say No to Celeron". Canadian Computer Wholesaler. http://www.zisman.ca/Articles/1998/Celeron.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ a b Pabst, Thomas (1998-08-24). "Big CPU Shoot Out: Intel Launches New Celeron with Mendocino Core and Pentium II 450". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/1998/08/24/big_cpu_shoot_out/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Joch, Alan (2001-04-30). "Buses: Front-side and backside". ITworld.com. http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1091/CWD010430STO60015/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Hachman, Mark (2000-03-29). "Intel launches Celerons with SIMD instruction-set extensions". My-ESM. http://www.my-esm.com/digest/story/OEG20000329S0006. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2001-01-03). "Intel Celeron 800: The first 100 MHz FSB Celeron". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=1393&p=1. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2001-10-02). "Intel's Celeron reaches 1.2 GHz". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2001/10/j031001celeron_12ghz.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2001-12-07). "Intel's Celeron gets major power boost". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2001/12/h071201celeron_tualatin.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2002-01-04). "Intel launches Celeron 1.3 GHz". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2002/01/h040102intel_celeron_3ghz.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2002-05-16). "Intel launches Celeron with new core". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2002/05/a160502celerons.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Völkel, Frank; Töpelt, Bert (2002-01-03). "Intel vs. AMD: Celeron 1300 vs. Duron 1200". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/2002/01/03/intel_vs/. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Schmidt, Patrick (2002-05-15). "Good Old Newbie: Intel's Celeron 1.7 GHz for Socket 478". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/2002/05/15/good_old_newbie/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2002-06-13). "Intel pushes Celerons to 1.8 GHz". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2002/06/a130602celeron_18.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2002-06-17). "Intel plans faster 0.13-micron Celeron". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2002/06/a170602celeron.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Sigvartsen, Ana (2002-09-19). "Intel launches new Celeron, updates prices". Infosatellite.com. http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2002/09/a190902celeron.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Schmid, Patrick (2002-10-16). "The New Generation Is Here: Celeron 2.0 GHz, with 0.13 µm". Tom's Hardware Guide. http://www.tomshardware.com/2002/10/16/the_new_generation_is_here/. Retrieved on 2007-07-30.
- ^ Shilov, Anton (2004-06-25). "Intel Officially Launched Celeron D Processors.". X-bit labs. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20040625022821.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Wilson, Derek (2004-06-24). "Intel Celeron D: New, Improved & Exceeds Expectations". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2093. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Aubrey, John (2005-04-18). "Celeron D: the Little Processor that Could". Dev Hardware. http://www.devhardware.com/c/a/Computer-Processors/Celeron-D-the-Little-Processor-that-Could. Retrieved on 2006-09-23.
- ^ Wilson, Derek (2004-06-24). "Intel Celeron D: New, Improved & Exceeds Expectations". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2093&p=5. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Gavrichenkov, Ilya (2004-06-25). "Intel Celeron D CPU: Budget Processors from Intel Acquire Prescott Core". X-bit labs. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-d_6.html. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Kowaliski, Cyril (2006-05-16). "65 nm Celeron Ds coming May 28". The Tech Report. http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/9982. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Huynh, Anh (2006-09-20). "Intel "Conroe-L" Details Unveiled". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4252. Retrieved on 2006-09-23.
- ^ Visionary (2007-02-13). "Intel Adds Cheapest Celeron 420 In June". VR-Zone. http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4657. Retrieved on 2007-02-20.
- ^ "Pentium Dual-Core E1000, Celeron 400, P35 und G33 starten offiziell" (in German). Heise News Ticker. 2007-06-05. http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/90628. Retrieved on 2007-06-13.
- ^ "Intel Preps Dual-Core Celeron Processors" (in English Language). 2007-10-11. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20071011171900.html. Retrieved on 2007-11-12.
- ^ Filatova, Anna (2002-06-25). "New Mobile Celeron on Northwood-256 Core". X-bit labs. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/news521.html. Retrieved on 2007-03-13.
- ^ a b "Intel to discontinue older Centrino CPUs in Q1 08". TG Daily. http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34115/122/. Retrieved on 2007-10-01.
[edit] External links
- Celeron E1200: Dual-Core Processor Almost for Free – X-bit labs tests dual-core Celeron CPU
- Intel Celeron M Processor – Product overview
- Intel Celeron M Banias, Dothan, and Yonah specifications
- Intel Pentium II and Pentium III based Celerons at cpu-collection.de
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
