Happy Planet Index

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Happy Planet Index, highest rank to lowest rank .

The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact, introduced by the New Economics Foundation (NEF), in July 2006. The index is designed to challenge well-established indices of countries’ development, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the Human Development Index (HDI), which are seen as not taking sustainability into account. In particular, GDP is seen as inappropriate, as the ultimate aim of most people is not to be rich, but to be happy and healthy.[1]. Further, the notion of sustainable development requires that we have a measure of the environmental costs of pursuing those goals.[2]

Contents

[edit] Outline

The HPI is based on general utilitarian principles — that most people want to live long and fulfilling lives, and the country which is doing the best is the one that allows its citizens to do so, whilst avoiding infringing on the opportunity of future people and people in other countries to do the same. In effect it operationalises the IUCN's (World Conservation Union) call for a metric capable of measuring 'the production of human well-being (not necessarily material goods) per unit of extraction of or imposition upon nature'.[3] Human well-being is operationalised as Happy Life Years.[4] Extraction of or imposition upon nature is proxied for using the ecological footprint per capita, which attempts to estimate the amount of natural resources required to sustain a given country's lifestyle. A country with a large per capita ecological footprint uses more than its fair share of resources, both by drawing resources from other countries, but also by causing permanent damage to the planet which will impact future generations.[5]

As such, the HPI is not a measure of which are the happiest countries in the world. Countries with relatively high levels of life satisfaction, as measured in surveys, are found from the very top (Colombia in 2nd place) to the very bottom (the USA in 150th place) of the rank order. The HPI is best conceived as a measure of the environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country. Such efficiency could emerge in a country with a medium environmental impact (e.g. Costa Rica) and very high well-being (e.g. Panama), but it could also emerge in a country with only mediocre well-being, but very low environmental impact (e.g. Vietnam).

Each country’s HPI value is a function of its average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and ecological footprint per capita. The exact function is a little more complex, but conceptually it approximates multiplying life satisfaction and life expectancy, and dividing that by the ecological footprint. Most of the life satisfaction data is taken from the World Values Survey and World Database of Happiness, but some is drawn from other surveys, and some is estimated using statistical regression techniques.

The best scoring country in 2006 is the island state of Vanuatu, followed by Colombia and Costa Rica, while Burundi, Swaziland and Zimbabwe form the bottom of the list.

[edit] Views

Happiest = Green > Blue > Purple > Orange > Red = Least Happy; Grey = Data not available The Satisfaction with Life Index shows life satisfaction scores from the HPI without adjusting for ecological footprint and life expectancy.

Much criticism of the index has been due to commentators falsely understanding it to be a measure of happiness, when it is in fact a measure of the ecological efficiency of supporting well-being (see, for example, the following blogs in Heavy Lifting[6] and Spiked[7]).

Aside from that, criticism has focused on the following:

  • That the HPI completely ignores issues like political freedom, human rights and labor rights[8].
  • That the World Values Survey covers only a minority of the world's nations and is only done every five years. As a result, much of the data for the index must come from other sources, or is estimated using regressions.
  • General suspicion of subjective measures of well-being.[9]
  • That the Ecological Footprint is a controversial concept with many criticisms.[10]

Nevertheless, the HPI and its subcomponents have been considered in political circles. The Ecological Footprint, championed by the WWF, is widely used by both local and national governments, as well as supranational organisations such as the European Commission. The HPI itself was recently cited in the British Conservative Party as a possible substitute for GDP, [11] . A recent review of progress indicators produced by the European Parliament[12], lists the following pros and cons to using the HPI as a measure of national progress:

Pros:

  • Considers the actual ‘ends’ of economic activity in the form of life satisfaction and longevity
  • Combines wellbeing and environmental aspects
  • Simple and easily understandable scheme for calculating the index
  • Comparability of results (‘EF’ and ‘life expectancy’ can be applied to different countries)
  • Data online available, although some data gaps remain
  • Mixture of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ criteria; takes into account people’s well-being and resource use of countries

Cons:

  • ‘Happiness’ or ‘life satisfaction’ are very subjective and personal: cultural influences and complex impact of policies on happiness
  • Confusion of name: index is not a measure of happiness but rather measure of environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country

[edit] International Ranking

Rank Country HPI
1  Vanuatu 68.21
2  Colombia 67.24
3  Costa Rica 66.00
4  Dominica 64.55
5  Panama 63.54
6  Cuba 61.86
7  Honduras 61.75
8  Guatemala 61.69
9  El Salvador 61.66
10  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 61.37
11  Saint Lucia 61.31
12  Vietnam 61.23
13  Bhutan 61.08
14  Samoa 60.98
15  Sri Lanka 60.31
16  Antigua and Barbuda 59.23
17  Philippines 59.17
18  Nicaragua 59.09
19  Kyrgyzstan 59.05
20  Solomon Islands 58.93
21  Tunisia 58.92
22  São Tomé and Príncipe 57.92
23  Indonesia 57.90
24  Tonga 57.90
25  Tajikistan 57.66
26  Venezuela 57.55
27  Dominican Republic 57.14
28  Guyana 56.65
29  Saint Kitts and Nevis 56.14
30  Seychelles 56.07
31  China 55.99
32  Thailand 55.39
33  Peru 55.14
34  Suriname 55.03
35  Yemen 55.00
36  Fiji 54.47
37  Morocco 54.43
38  Mexico 54.39
39  Maldives 53.52
40  Malta 53.26
41  Bangladesh 53.20
42  Comoros 52.92
43  Barbados 52.73
44  Malaysia 52.69
45  Palestinian Authority 52.64
46  Cape Verde 52.41
47  Chile 52.20
48  Timor-Leste 52.04
49  Argentina 51.96
50  Trinidad and Tobago 51.87
51  Belize 51.32
52  Paraguay 51.13
53  Jamaica 51.01
54  Nepal 49.95
55  Mauritius 49.65
56  Mongolia 49.59
57  Uruguay 49.31
58  Ecuador 49.29
59  Uzbekistan 49.22
60  Grenada 48.96
61  Austria 48.77
62  The Gambia 48.67
63  Brazil 48.59
64  Iceland 48.35
65  Switzerland 48.30
66  Italy 48.26
67  Iran 47.23
68  Ghana 46.98
69  Bolivia 46.17
70  Netherlands 46.00
71  Madagascar 45.99
72  Cyprus 45.99
73  Algeria 45.89
74  Luxembourg 45.62
75  Bahamas 44.90
76  Papua New Guinea 44.75
77  Myanmar 44.55
78  Belgium 44.04
79  Slovenia 44.03
80  Oman 43.94
81  Germany 43.83
82  Croatia 43.71
83  Lebanon 43.64
84  Taiwan 43.41
85  Haiti 43.34
86  Syria 43.23
87  Spain 43.04
88  Hong Kong 42.88
89  Saudi Arabia 42.65
90  India 42.46
91  Cambodia 42.15
92  Albania 42.13
93  Jordan 42.05
94  New Zealand 41.92
95  Japan 41.70
96  Republic of the Congo 41.59
97  Egypt 41.58
98  Turkey 41.40
99  Denmark 41.40
100  Brunei 41.16
101  Georgia 41.15
102  South Korea 41.11
103  Bosnia and Herzegovina 40.96
104  Senegal 40.81
105  Azerbaijan 40.69
106  Gabon 40.52
107  Libya 40.33
108  United Kingdom 40.29
109  Laos 40.26
110  Benin 40.10
111  Canada 39.76
112  Pakistan 39.40
113  Ireland 39.38
114  Poland 39.29
115  Norway 39.18
116  Republic of Macedonia 39.14
117  Israel 39.07
118  Namibia 38.41
119  Sweden 38.17
120  Romania 37.72
121  Hungary 37.64
122  Guinea 37.42
123  Finland 37.36
124  Mauritania 37.30
125  Kazakhstan 36.92
126  Togo 36.86
127  Kenya 36.70
128  Czech Republic 36.59
129  France 36.42
130  Armenia 36.15
131  Singapore 36.14
132  Slovakia 35.81
133  Greece 35.71
134  Tanzania 35.08
135  Guinea-Bissau 35.08
136  Portugal 34.83
137  Eritrea 34.49
138  Bahrain 34.35
139  Australia 34.06
140  Mali 33.68
141  Mozambique 33.01
142  Cameroon 32.76
143  Djibouti 32.72
144  Ethiopia 32.53
145  Bulgaria 31.59
146  Nigeria 31.14
147  Moldova 31.12
148  Burkina Faso 30.08
149  Lithuania 29.29
150  United States 28.83
151  Côte d'Ivoire 28.80
152  Rwanda 28.35
153  Sierra Leone 28.24
154  United Arab Emirates 28.20
155  Angola 27.88
156  South Africa 27.80
157  Sudan 27.74
158  Uganda 27.68
159  Kuwait 27.67
160  Latvia 27.27
161  Niger 26.80
162  Malawi 26.66
163  Zambia 25.91
164  Central African Republic 25.90
165  Belarus 25.78
166  Qatar 25.50
167  Botswana 25.42
168  Chad 25.37
169  Turkmenistan 23.96
170  Equatorial Guinea 23.77
171  Lesotho 23.05
172  Russia 22.76
173  Estonia 22.68
174  Ukraine 22.21
175  Democratic Republic of the Congo 20.69
176  Burundi 19.02
177  Swaziland 18.38
178  Zimbabwe 16.64

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0192893300. 
  2. ^ Hawken, Paul; Lovins, Amory, and Hovins, L. Hunter (1999). Natural Capitalism. New York, New York: Little Brown & Co.. ISBN 0316353000. 
  3. ^ Adams WM (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Also, Paehlke R (2005). Sustainability as a bridging concept. Conservation Biology 19:36-8.
  4. ^ Veenhoven R (1996). Happy life expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research 39:1-58.
  5. ^ Global Footprint Network :: HOME - Ecological Footprint - Ecological Sustainability
  6. ^ Heavy Lifting
  7. ^ spiked | Who’s happiest: Denmark or Vanuatu?
  8. ^ http://www.worldchanging.com/archives//004679.html
  9. ^ Johns H & Ormerod P (2007). Happiness, Economics and Public Policy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs
  10. ^ The Economist, 19th Sep 2002, Treading Lightly
  11. ^ Cameron to offer green tax cuts - Times Online
  12. ^ Goossens Y, et al. (2007). Alternative progress indicators to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. IP/A/ENVI/ST/2007-10. Study provided for the European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Available at http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/background-papers.html

[edit] External links

Personal tools