Happy Planet Index
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) is an index of human well-being and environmental impact, introduced by the New Economics Foundation (NEF), in July 2006. The index is designed to challenge well-established indices of countries’ development, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the Human Development Index (HDI), which are seen as not taking sustainability into account. In particular, GDP is seen as inappropriate, as the ultimate aim of most people is not to be rich, but to be happy and healthy.[1]. Further, the notion of sustainable development requires that we have a measure of the environmental costs of pursuing those goals.[2]
Contents |
[edit] Outline
The HPI is based on general utilitarian principles — that most people want to live long and fulfilling lives, and the country which is doing the best is the one that allows its citizens to do so, whilst avoiding infringing on the opportunity of future people and people in other countries to do the same. In effect it operationalises the IUCN's (World Conservation Union) call for a metric capable of measuring 'the production of human well-being (not necessarily material goods) per unit of extraction of or imposition upon nature'.[3] Human well-being is operationalised as Happy Life Years.[4] Extraction of or imposition upon nature is proxied for using the ecological footprint per capita, which attempts to estimate the amount of natural resources required to sustain a given country's lifestyle. A country with a large per capita ecological footprint uses more than its fair share of resources, both by drawing resources from other countries, but also by causing permanent damage to the planet which will impact future generations.[5]
As such, the HPI is not a measure of which are the happiest countries in the world. Countries with relatively high levels of life satisfaction, as measured in surveys, are found from the very top (Colombia in 2nd place) to the very bottom (the USA in 150th place) of the rank order. The HPI is best conceived as a measure of the environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country. Such efficiency could emerge in a country with a medium environmental impact (e.g. Costa Rica) and very high well-being (e.g. Panama), but it could also emerge in a country with only mediocre well-being, but very low environmental impact (e.g. Vietnam).
Each country’s HPI value is a function of its average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and ecological footprint per capita. The exact function is a little more complex, but conceptually it approximates multiplying life satisfaction and life expectancy, and dividing that by the ecological footprint. Most of the life satisfaction data is taken from the World Values Survey and World Database of Happiness, but some is drawn from other surveys, and some is estimated using statistical regression techniques.
The best scoring country in 2006 is the island state of Vanuatu, followed by Colombia and Costa Rica, while Burundi, Swaziland and Zimbabwe form the bottom of the list.
[edit] Views
Much criticism of the index has been due to commentators falsely understanding it to be a measure of happiness, when it is in fact a measure of the ecological efficiency of supporting well-being (see, for example, the following blogs in Heavy Lifting[6] and Spiked[7]).
Aside from that, criticism has focused on the following:
- That the HPI completely ignores issues like political freedom, human rights and labor rights[8].
- That the World Values Survey covers only a minority of the world's nations and is only done every five years. As a result, much of the data for the index must come from other sources, or is estimated using regressions.
- General suspicion of subjective measures of well-being.[9]
- That the Ecological Footprint is a controversial concept with many criticisms.[10]
Nevertheless, the HPI and its subcomponents have been considered in political circles. The Ecological Footprint, championed by the WWF, is widely used by both local and national governments, as well as supranational organisations such as the European Commission. The HPI itself was recently cited in the British Conservative Party as a possible substitute for GDP, [11] . A recent review of progress indicators produced by the European Parliament[12], lists the following pros and cons to using the HPI as a measure of national progress:
Pros:
- Considers the actual ‘ends’ of economic activity in the form of life satisfaction and longevity
- Combines wellbeing and environmental aspects
- Simple and easily understandable scheme for calculating the index
- Comparability of results (‘EF’ and ‘life expectancy’ can be applied to different countries)
- Data online available, although some data gaps remain
- Mixture of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ criteria; takes into account people’s well-being and resource use of countries
Cons:
- ‘Happiness’ or ‘life satisfaction’ are very subjective and personal: cultural influences and complex impact of policies on happiness
- Confusion of name: index is not a measure of happiness but rather measure of environmental efficiency of supporting well-being in a given country
[edit] International Ranking
Rank | Country | HPI |
---|---|---|
1 | Vanuatu | 68.21 |
2 | Colombia | 67.24 |
3 | Costa Rica | 66.00 |
4 | Dominica | 64.55 |
5 | Panama | 63.54 |
6 | Cuba | 61.86 |
7 | Honduras | 61.75 |
8 | Guatemala | 61.69 |
9 | El Salvador | 61.66 |
10 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 61.37 |
11 | Saint Lucia | 61.31 |
12 | Vietnam | 61.23 |
13 | Bhutan | 61.08 |
14 | Samoa | 60.98 |
15 | Sri Lanka | 60.31 |
16 | Antigua and Barbuda | 59.23 |
17 | Philippines | 59.17 |
18 | Nicaragua | 59.09 |
19 | Kyrgyzstan | 59.05 |
20 | Solomon Islands | 58.93 |
21 | Tunisia | 58.92 |
22 | São Tomé and Príncipe | 57.92 |
23 | Indonesia | 57.90 |
24 | Tonga | 57.90 |
25 | Tajikistan | 57.66 |
26 | Venezuela | 57.55 |
27 | Dominican Republic | 57.14 |
28 | Guyana | 56.65 |
29 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 56.14 |
30 | Seychelles | 56.07 |
31 | China | 55.99 |
32 | Thailand | 55.39 |
33 | Peru | 55.14 |
34 | Suriname | 55.03 |
35 | Yemen | 55.00 |
36 | Fiji | 54.47 |
37 | Morocco | 54.43 |
38 | Mexico | 54.39 |
39 | Maldives | 53.52 |
40 | Malta | 53.26 |
41 | Bangladesh | 53.20 |
42 | Comoros | 52.92 |
43 | Barbados | 52.73 |
44 | Malaysia | 52.69 |
45 | Palestinian Authority | 52.64 |
46 | Cape Verde | 52.41 |
47 | Chile | 52.20 |
48 | Timor-Leste | 52.04 |
49 | Argentina | 51.96 |
50 | Trinidad and Tobago | 51.87 |
51 | Belize | 51.32 |
52 | Paraguay | 51.13 |
53 | Jamaica | 51.01 |
54 | Nepal | 49.95 |
55 | Mauritius | 49.65 |
56 | Mongolia | 49.59 |
57 | Uruguay | 49.31 |
58 | Ecuador | 49.29 |
59 | Uzbekistan | 49.22 |
60 | Grenada | 48.96 |
61 | Austria | 48.77 |
62 | The Gambia | 48.67 |
63 | Brazil | 48.59 |
64 | Iceland | 48.35 |
65 | Switzerland | 48.30 |
66 | Italy | 48.26 |
67 | Iran | 47.23 |
68 | Ghana | 46.98 |
69 | Bolivia | 46.17 |
70 | Netherlands | 46.00 |
71 | Madagascar | 45.99 |
72 | Cyprus | 45.99 |
73 | Algeria | 45.89 |
74 | Luxembourg | 45.62 |
75 | Bahamas | 44.90 |
76 | Papua New Guinea | 44.75 |
77 | Myanmar | 44.55 |
78 | Belgium | 44.04 |
79 | Slovenia | 44.03 |
80 | Oman | 43.94 |
81 | Germany | 43.83 |
82 | Croatia | 43.71 |
83 | Lebanon | 43.64 |
84 | Taiwan | 43.41 |
85 | Haiti | 43.34 |
86 | Syria | 43.23 |
87 | Spain | 43.04 |
88 | Hong Kong | 42.88 |
89 | Saudi Arabia | 42.65 |
90 | India | 42.46 |
91 | Cambodia | 42.15 |
92 | Albania | 42.13 |
93 | Jordan | 42.05 |
94 | New Zealand | 41.92 |
95 | Japan | 41.70 |
96 | Republic of the Congo | 41.59 |
97 | Egypt | 41.58 |
98 | Turkey | 41.40 |
99 | Denmark | 41.40 |
100 | Brunei | 41.16 |
101 | Georgia | 41.15 |
102 | South Korea | 41.11 |
103 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 40.96 |
104 | Senegal | 40.81 |
105 | Azerbaijan | 40.69 |
106 | Gabon | 40.52 |
107 | Libya | 40.33 |
108 | United Kingdom | 40.29 |
109 | Laos | 40.26 |
110 | Benin | 40.10 |
111 | Canada | 39.76 |
112 | Pakistan | 39.40 |
113 | Ireland | 39.38 |
114 | Poland | 39.29 |
115 | Norway | 39.18 |
116 | Republic of Macedonia | 39.14 |
117 | Israel | 39.07 |
118 | Namibia | 38.41 |
119 | Sweden | 38.17 |
120 | Romania | 37.72 |
121 | Hungary | 37.64 |
122 | Guinea | 37.42 |
123 | Finland | 37.36 |
124 | Mauritania | 37.30 |
125 | Kazakhstan | 36.92 |
126 | Togo | 36.86 |
127 | Kenya | 36.70 |
128 | Czech Republic | 36.59 |
129 | France | 36.42 |
130 | Armenia | 36.15 |
131 | Singapore | 36.14 |
132 | Slovakia | 35.81 |
133 | Greece | 35.71 |
134 | Tanzania | 35.08 |
135 | Guinea-Bissau | 35.08 |
136 | Portugal | 34.83 |
137 | Eritrea | 34.49 |
138 | Bahrain | 34.35 |
139 | Australia | 34.06 |
140 | Mali | 33.68 |
141 | Mozambique | 33.01 |
142 | Cameroon | 32.76 |
143 | Djibouti | 32.72 |
144 | Ethiopia | 32.53 |
145 | Bulgaria | 31.59 |
146 | Nigeria | 31.14 |
147 | Moldova | 31.12 |
148 | Burkina Faso | 30.08 |
149 | Lithuania | 29.29 |
150 | United States | 28.83 |
151 | Côte d'Ivoire | 28.80 |
152 | Rwanda | 28.35 |
153 | Sierra Leone | 28.24 |
154 | United Arab Emirates | 28.20 |
155 | Angola | 27.88 |
156 | South Africa | 27.80 |
157 | Sudan | 27.74 |
158 | Uganda | 27.68 |
159 | Kuwait | 27.67 |
160 | Latvia | 27.27 |
161 | Niger | 26.80 |
162 | Malawi | 26.66 |
163 | Zambia | 25.91 |
164 | Central African Republic | 25.90 |
165 | Belarus | 25.78 |
166 | Qatar | 25.50 |
167 | Botswana | 25.42 |
168 | Chad | 25.37 |
169 | Turkmenistan | 23.96 |
170 | Equatorial Guinea | 23.77 |
171 | Lesotho | 23.05 |
172 | Russia | 22.76 |
173 | Estonia | 22.68 |
174 | Ukraine | 22.21 |
175 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 20.69 |
176 | Burundi | 19.02 |
177 | Swaziland | 18.38 |
178 | Zimbabwe | 16.64 |
[edit] See also
- Gross national happiness
- Satisfaction with Life Index
- Genuine Progress Indicator
- Legatum Prosperity Index
[edit] Notes
- ^ Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0192893300.
- ^ Hawken, Paul; Lovins, Amory, and Hovins, L. Hunter (1999). Natural Capitalism. New York, New York: Little Brown & Co.. ISBN 0316353000.
- ^ Adams WM (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Also, Paehlke R (2005). Sustainability as a bridging concept. Conservation Biology 19:36-8.
- ^ Veenhoven R (1996). Happy life expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research 39:1-58.
- ^ Global Footprint Network :: HOME - Ecological Footprint - Ecological Sustainability
- ^ Heavy Lifting
- ^ spiked | Who’s happiest: Denmark or Vanuatu?
- ^ http://www.worldchanging.com/archives//004679.html
- ^ Johns H & Ormerod P (2007). Happiness, Economics and Public Policy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs
- ^ The Economist, 19th Sep 2002, Treading Lightly
- ^ Cameron to offer green tax cuts - Times Online
- ^ Goossens Y, et al. (2007). Alternative progress indicators to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. IP/A/ENVI/ST/2007-10. Study provided for the European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Available at http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/background-papers.html