Systemics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Systemics is the emerging branch of science that studies holistic systems. It tries to develop logical, mathematical, engineering and philosophical paradigms and frameworks in which physical, technological, biological, social, cognitive and metaphysical systems can be studied and developed. Systemics can be considered an alternative name for all research related to General Systems Theory and Systems science.

Contents

[edit] Introduction

Systemics is the science of systems. It has been developed by reaction of a tendency in modern science, towards reductionist, immanentist[weasel words] view, according to which knowledge concerning all the parts of a whole would additively entail a complete knowledge of also that whole. Systemics draws methodic attention upon contextuality: making clear the necessity to consider the functionings of the interacting elements from within that system, and furthermore the relation with the systems inhabiting the environment of that system.[1]

Systemics tends to generalize results obtained in cybernetics, classical engineering, systems theory and other sciences to derive principles common to many fields, based on scientific paradigms. This inclusion of general principles characterizes the philosophy of systems. Systemics also generates many metaphysical questions, therefore, is closely related to contemporary philosophy, intelligence research and complex systems.

Charles François, editor of the International Encyclopedia of Cybernetics and Systems, in the 1990s suggested that "Systemics" be used to avoid the familiar and ambiguous terms "systems thinking," "systems science," and "general systems theory."

[edit] Systemics: Topics

[edit] Cognitive and practical motivations

Systemics has two related motivations, one cognitive and one practical. The cognitive or theoretical rationale of systemics is the wish to discover similarities among systems of all kinds, despite their specific differences - e.g. between body temperature control systems and furnace thermostats. The practical motivation for systemics is the need to cope with the huge and many-sided systems characteristics of industrial societies - such as ecology, infrastructure, energy supply, waste production & treatment, communications, networks, factories, hospitals, and armies. This complexity, in particular the variety of components of such systems, violates the traditional borders among disciplines and calls for a cross-disciplinary approach.[2]

[edit] Meta language

Systemics and cybernetics can be viewed as a metalanguage of concepts and models for transdisciplinarian use, still now evolving and far from being stabilized. This is the result of a slow process of accretion through inclusion and interconnection of many notions, which came and are still coming from very different disciplines. The process started more than a century ago, but has gathered momentum since 1948 through the pioneering work of Norbert Wiener, John von Neumann, Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Heinz von Foerster and W. Ross Ashby, among many others.[3]

[edit] Scientific methodology

The Argentinian-Canadian epistemologist Mario Bunge developed a very acute critical study of systemics as a scientific methodology, and in a sense philosophy. He debunked some myths concerning abusive holism, but at the same time revindicated the usefulness of systemics, especially in the fourth volume of his 'Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology II. A World of Systems.[3]

[edit] History

Until the 1940's, every science studied systems of some kind, and every species of system was studied separately. Since that time, a number of specialists joined efforts to launch various cross-disciplinary ventures, such as operations research and cybernetics. They suggested that a unified approach to problems in various fields was possible. The discipline that purports to develop such unified approach is often called "general systems theory". Paradoxically, this is not a single theory but a whole set of theories - automata theory, linear systems theory, control theory, network theory, general Lagrangian dynamics, etc. - unified by a philosophical framework. Mario Bunge in 1979 proposed to call this set systemics, referring to "the set of theories that focus on the structural characteristics of systems".[2]

The term Systemics is used by J.K. Feibleman in his Foundations of Empiricism (1962) to name a domain of finite ontology. Systemics was a third domain beside categorematics and axiomatics.[4]

One of the propagandists of systemics in popular science in Europe was German ecologist Frederic Vester who had inspirational influence on the Green politics movement since the late 1960s. He was part of the team at Jay Wright Forrester's Institute for System Dynamics at MIT, who presented the highly discussed report "The Limits to Growth" to the Club of Rome in 1972.

[edit] Applications of systemics

By now there are different spiritual/political/ecologic movements and theories, which incorporate a certain holistic approach and systemic view, like deep ecology (though they seldom use specific scientific tools, like Vester's model - which he presented to the Club of Rome in 2002).

Another key figure of cybernetics had influence in psychiatry/psychology and anthropology/sociology: Gregory Bateson. In those fields systemics are applied to gain a more specific treatment of parameters in a systemic set like e.g. rehabilitation of drug-addicts, social reintegration of freed prisoners, dynamics of family members, personal integration of ecstatic/"altered states of mind"-experiences and so on.

Systemics of learning [5][6]

In the 1990s Robert E. Young developed a systemics for learning and communication. He saw systemics as action-oriented pragmatics. Utterances are construed as meaningful deeds of special kind, whose meanings are interpretively created by hearers to reference both the words (lexicon) and the structure of words (grammar) to the social situation and to the more general background knowledge of culture. This is precisely Habermas' view. In systematics, speech and writing relate the context of social situation and cultural background in several ways. There is said to be a "field" relation and a "mode" relation of all meaning or messages.[7]

Other applications

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Mioara Mugur-Schächter, Alwyn Van der Merwe (2002), Quantum Mechanics, Mathematics, Cognition and Action, 493 pp.
  2. ^ a b Mario Bunge (1979). A world of systems. Dordrecht ; Boston, Reidel.
  3. ^ a b Charles François (1999), Systemics and Cybernetics in a Historical Perspective. in: Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol 16, pp.203-219.
  4. ^ James Kern Feibleman (1962), Foundations of Empiricism, M. Nijhoff.
  5. ^ Young, Robert E. (1992). Critical Theory and Classroom Talk. 
  6. ^ Lesh, Richard A.; Eric Hamilton, James J. Kaput (2007). Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education. 
  7. ^ Young, Robert E. (1996). Intercultural Communication: Pragmatics, Genealogy, Deconstruction. 
  8. ^ Alderson, Wroe (1965). Dynamic Marketing Behavior: A Functionalist Theory of Marketing. 
  9. ^ Alderson, Wroe; Ben Wooliscroft, Robert D. Tamilia, Stanley J. Shapiro (2006). A Twenty-First Century Guide to Aldersonian Marketing Thought. 

[edit] Further reading

[edit] External links

v • d • e
Systems and systems science
Systems categories
Systems
Theoretical fields
Systems scientists
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemics"
Personal tools
Languages