Chess tactics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

In chess, a tactic refers to a short sequence of moves which limits the opponent's options and may result in tangible gain. Tactics are usually contrasted to strategy, in which advantages take longer to be realized, and the opponent is less constrained in responding[1].

The fundamental building blocks of tactics are two-move sequences in which the first move poses a double threat. The opponent is unable to respond to both threats in one move, so the first player realizes an advantage on the second move. This includes forks, skewers, batteries, discovered attacks, undermining, overloading, deflection, and interference[2]. Pins also fall into this category to some extent, although it is common for a defending player to relieve neither of the two threats posed by a pin, in which case the attacking player commonly maintains the pin for a longer period of time. A pin is therefore sometimes more strategic than tactical.

Often tactics of several types are conjoined in a combination. A combination, while still constraining the opponent's responses, takes several moves to obtain an advantage, and thus is considered deeper and more spectacular than the basic tactics listed above.

Chess computers are considered superhuman at tactics, but rather poor at strategy. Computers do not think about tactics in human terms (fork, skewer, etc.); rather, they apply very simple rules to evaluate hundreds of thousands of sequences, the vast majority of which are spurious.

Contents

[edit] Attacking and defending pieces

A piece is said to attack (or threaten) an opponent's piece if, in the next move, it could capture that piece. A piece is said to defend (or protect) a piece of the defender's color if, in case the defended piece were taken by the opponent, the defender could recapture right away. Attacking a piece usually, but not always (see sacrifice), forces the opponent to respond if the attacked piece is undefended, or if the attacking piece is of lower value than the attacked one.

When attacked, one has several options:

  • Capture the attacking piece.
  • Move the attacked piece.
  • Interpose another piece in between the two.
  • Guard the attacked piece and permit an exchange.
  • Pin the attacking piece so the capture becomes illegal or unprofitable.
  • Use a zwischenzug.
  • Create a counter-threat.

[edit] Discovered attack

Garry Kasparov vs. World Team 1999
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 rd b8 c8 d8 e8 kd f8 g8 h8 rd Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 pd b7 pd c7 nl d7 e7 pd f7 pd g7 bd h7 pd
a6 b6 c6 nd d6 pd e6 f6 nd g6 pd h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 pl d4 e4 qd f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 d2 e2 nl f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 c1 bl d1 ql e1 f1 rl g1 kl h1
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Kasparov played 12.Nc7+, which forks black's king and rook on a8.

A discovered attack is a move which unmasks an attack by another piece. A piece is moved away so as to unmask the attack of a friendly bishop, rook or queen on an enemy piece. If the attacked piece is the king, the situation is referred to as a discovered check. Discovered attacks are powerful as the moving piece may be able to pose a second threat.

A special case of a discovered check is a double check, where both the piece being unmasked and the piece being moved attack the enemy king. A double check requires that the opponent moves his/her king as the king is under attack from two directions and it is impossible to counter both at the same time in any other way.

[edit] Fork

A fork is a move that uses one piece to attack two or more of the opponent's pieces simultaneously, hoping to achieve material advantage, since the opponent can only counter one of the two threats. Knights are often used for forks, with their unique moving and jumping ability. A common situation is a knight jumping to c2 or c7, thereby threatening both the enemy rook and the king. Such "king forks" are particularly effective, because the opponent is forced by the rules of the game to alleviate the threat to the king. The opponent cannot choose to defend the other piece, and thus cannot use a zwischenzug to complicate the situation. Pawns can also be effective for forking. By moving a pawn forward, it may attack two pieces; one diagonally to the left and one diagonally to the right.

Queens are also excellent forking pieces, because they can move in eight different directions. However, this is only useful if both pieces are undefended, or if one is undefended and the other is the opposing king. The queen is the most valuable piece (excluding the king), so it is usually not profitable for it to capture a defended piece.

[edit] Pin

Paul Morphy vs. Consultation Team 1858
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 kd f8 bd g8 h8 rd Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 pd b7 c7 d7 rd e7 qd f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 nd g6 h6
a5 b5 bl c5 d5 e5 pd f5 g5 bl h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 pl f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 ql c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 pl d2 e2 f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 b1 c1 kl d1 rl e1 f1 g1 h1
Image:chess zhor 26.png
After Morphy's 14th move, both Black's knight and rook on d7 are pinned.

A pin is a move which forces one of the opponent's pieces to stay put because moving it would expose a more valuable piece behind it. Sometimes pinned pieces cannot move at all, as doing so would expose the king. Only bishops, rooks, and queens can pin other pieces, because they move in straight lines.

[edit] Skewer

A skewer is a move which attacks two pieces in a line, similar to a pin, except that the enemy piece of greater value is in front of the piece of lesser value. After the more valuable piece moves away, the lesser piece can be captured. Queens, rooks, and bishops can perform the skewer.

[edit] Pawns

Pawns are extremely useful in the game and are far more powerful than meets the eye. When a piece cannot be captured without the attacking piece also being captured, pawns will suffice for that purpose. A single pawn approaching will force a more powerful piece, such as a rook or a knight, to retreat. A simple move of a pawn may reveal a hidden threat (see Discovered attacks). Also, when pawns are arranged in a diagonal line, with the frontmost pawns guarded by the pawns behind, they form an almost impenetrable wall capable of protecting any pieces directly behind them. Furthermore, a pawn which has progressed all the way to the opposite side of the board may be promoted to any other piece except a king.However, a weak pawn structure can be a big weakness.

[edit] Sacrifices

Colle vs. O'Hanlon 1930
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 rd b8 c8 bd d8 qd e8 rd f8 g8 kd h8 Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 pd b7 pd c7 d7 nd e7 f7 pd g7 pd h7 bl
a6 b6 c6 d6 bd e6 pd f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 pd e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 pl d3 e3 f3 nl g3 h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 d2 e2 f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 c1 bl d1 ql e1 rl f1 g1 kl h1
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Colle played 12.Bxh7+, an example of the so-called Greek gift sacrifice.

Sacrificing some material is often necessary to throw the opponent's position out of balance. The sacrificed material is sometimes able to be regained with interest a couple of moves later. Pawn sacrifices in the opening are known as gambits; they are usually not intended for a short-term gain, but instead to achieve a more active position.

Direct attacks against the enemy king are often started by sacrifices. A common example is sacrificing a bishop on h2 or h7, checking the king, who usually must take the bishop. This allows the queen and knight to develop a fulminate attack.

[edit] Zugzwang

Zugzwang (German for compulsion to move) occurs when a player is forced to make an undesirable move. The player is put at a disadvantage because he would prefer to pass and make no move, but a move has to be made, all of which weaken his position. Situations involving zugzwang occur uncommonly, but when they do occur, it is almost always in the endgame, where there are fewer choices of available moves.

[edit] Zwischenzug

Zwischenzug (German for intermediate move) is a common tactic which, instead of countering a direct threat, a move is played which poses an even more devastating threat, often an attack against the queen or the king. The opponent has to counter that threat first, and this will ideally change the situation to a disadvantage for that player.

The concept of a zwischenzug is often listed as a tactic, but might properly be called a counter-tactic instead. The effect of a zwischenzug is to change the status quo before a tactic can come to fruition. The near ubiquity of the zwischenzug makes long combinations all the more rare and impressive.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Jose Fadul, Lessons in Chess, Lessons in Life (Morrisville, North Carolina: Lulu.com, 2008) ISBN 978-0-557-02158-1
  2. ^ Edward R. Brace, Illustrated Dictionary of Chess (Fodor's Travel Publications, 1978) ISBN 978-0-679-50814-4

[edit] Further reading

[edit] External links

Personal tools