AA tree

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

An AA tree in computer science is a form of balanced tree used for storing and retrieving ordered data efficiently. AA trees are named for Arne Andersson, their inventor.

AA trees are a variation of the red-black tree, which in turn is an enhancement to the binary search tree. Unlike red-black trees, red nodes on an AA tree can only be added as a right subchild. In other words, no red node can be a left sub-child. This results in the simulation of a 2-3 tree instead of a 2-3-4 tree, which greatly simplifies the maintenance operations. The maintenance algorithms for a red-black tree need to consider seven different shapes to properly balance the tree:

Image:Red Black Shape Cases.svg

An AA tree on the other hand only needs to consider two shapes due to the strict requirement that only right links can be red:

Image:AA Tree Shape Cases.svg

Contents

[edit] Balancing Rotations

Typically, AA trees are implemented with the idea of a level instead of that of a color, unlike red-black trees. Each node has a level field, and the following invariants must remain true for the tree to be valid:

  1. The level of a leaf node is one.
  2. The level of a left child is strictly less than that of its parent.
  3. The level of a right child is less than or equal to that of its parent.
  4. The level of a right grandchild is strictly less than that of its grandparent.
  5. Every node of level greater than one must have two children.

Only two operations are needed for maintaining balance in an AA tree. These operations are called skew and split. Skew is a right rotation when an insertion or deletion creates a left horizontal link, which can be thought of as a left red link in the red-black tree context. Split is a conditional left rotation when an insertion or deletion creates two horizontal right links, which once again corresponds to two consecutive red links in red-black trees.

function skew is
    input: T, a node representing an AA tree that needs to be rebalanced.
    output: Another node representing the rebalanced AA tree.

    if nil(T) then
        return Nil
    else if level(left(T)) == level(T) then
        Swap the pointers of horizontal left links.
        L = left(T)
        left(T) := right(L)
        right(L) := T
        return L
    else
        return T
    end if
end function

Skew: Image:AA Tree Skew2.svg

function split is
    input: T, a node representing an AA tree that needs to be rebalanced.
    output: Another node representing the rebalanced AA tree.

    if nil(T) then
        return Nil
    else if level(T) == level(right(right(T))) then
        We have two horizontal right links.  Take the middle node, elevate it, and return it.
        R = right(T)
        right(T) := left(R)
        left(R) := T
        level(R) := level(R) + 1
        return R
    else
        return T
    end if
end function

Split: Image:AA Tree Split2.svg

[edit] Insertion

Insertion begins with the normal binary tree search and insertion procedure. Then, as the call stack unwinds, it's easy to check the validity of the tree and perform any rotations as necessary. If a horizontal left link arises, a skew will be performed, and if two horizontal right links arise, a split will be performed, possibly incrementing the level of the new root node of the current subtree. Note in the code as given above the increment of level(T). This makes it necessary to continue checking the validity of the tree as the modifications bubble up from the leaves.

function insert is
    input: X, the value to be inserted, and T, the root of the tree to insert it into.
    output: A balanced version T including X.

    Do the normal binary tree insertion procedure.  Set the result of the
    recursive call to the correct child in case a new node was created or the
    root of the subtree changes.
    if nil(T) then
        Create a new leaf node with X.
        return node(X, 1, Nil, Nil)
    else if X < value(T) then
        left(T) := insert(X, left(T))
    else if X > value(T) then
        right(T) := insert(X, right(T))
    end if
    Note that the case of X == value(T) is unspecified.  As given, an insert
    will have no effect.  The implementor may desire different behavior.

    Perform skew and then split.  The conditionals that determine whether or
    not a rotation will occur or not are inside of the procedures, as given
    above.
    T := skew(T)
    T := split(T)

    return T
end function

[edit] Deletion

As in most balanced binary trees, the deletion of an internal node can be turned into the deletion of a leaf node by swapping the internal node with either its closest predecessor or successor, depending on which are in the tree or the implementor's whims. Retrieving a predecessor is simply a matter of following one left link and then all of the remaining right links. Similarly, the successor can be found by going right once and left until a null pointer is found. Because of the AA property of all nodes of level greater than one having two children, the successor or predecessor node will be in level 1, making their removal trivial.

To re-balance a tree, there are a few approaches. The one described by Andersson in his original paper is the simplest, and it is described here, although actual implementations may opt for a more optimized approach. After a removal, the first step to maintaining tree validity is to lower the level of any nodes whose children are two levels below them, or who are missing children. Then, the entire level must be skewed and split. This approach was favored, because when laid down conceptually, it has three easily understood separate steps:

  1. Decrease the level, if appropriate.
  2. Skew the level.
  3. Split the level.

However, we have to skew and split the entire level this time instead of just a node, complicating our code.

function delete is
    input: X, the value to delete, and T, the root of the tree from which it should be deleted.
    output: T, balanced, without the value X.

    if X > value(T) then
        right(T) := delete(X, right(T))
    else if X < value(T) then
        left(T) := delete(X, left(T))
    else
        If we're a leaf, easy, otherwise reduce to leaf case. 
        if leaf(T) then
            return Nil
        else if nil(left(T)) then
            L := successor(T)
            right(T) := delete(L, right(T))
            value(T) := L
        else
            L := predecessor(T)
            left(T) := delete(L, left(T))
            value(T) := L
        end if
    end if

    Rebalance the tree.  Decrease the level of all nodes in this level if
    necessary, and then skew and split all nodes in the new level.
    T := decrease_level(T)
    T := skew(T)
    right(T) := skew(right(T))
    right(right(T)) := skew(right(right(T)))
    T := split(T)
    right(T) := split(right(T))
end function

function decrease_level is
    input: T, a tree for which we want to remove links that skip levels.
    output: T with its level decreased.

    should_be = min(level(left(T)), level(right(T))) + 1
    if should_be < level(T) then
        level(T) := should_be
        if should_be < level(right(T)) then
            level(right(T)) := should_be
        end if
    end if
    return T
end function

A good example of deletion by this algorithm is present in the Andersson paper.

[edit] Performance

The performance of an AA tree is equivalent to the performance of a red-black tree. While an AA tree makes more rotations than a red-black tree, the simpler algorithms tend to be faster, and all of this balances out to result in similar performance. A red-black tree is more consistent in its performance than an AA tree, but an AA tree tends to be flatter, which results in slightly faster search times.[citation needed]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AA_tree"
Personal tools
Languages